Emily LakdawallaJan 18, 2008

MESSENGER's First Mercury Flyby Highly Successful

On the evening of Tuesday, January 15, the MESSENGER science team crowded around a computer screen, anxiously awaiting their first view of the previously unseen hemisphere of Mercury. The moment was more dramatic than initially expected, because the MESSENGER mission had had a planned Tuesday morning deep-space communications session taken from it to respond to an emergency on another mission. To make sure that at least one image would be returned from the spacecraft before another day passed, the MESSENGER imaging team was asked to select one, and only one, photo to be given highest priority and returned from the spacecraft ahead of other instrument data. They selected a global shot of Mercury containing terrain never seen by spacecraft eyes. "It was extremely exciting," says science team member Clark Chapman. "I was just overwhelmed."

MESSENGER's view of Mercury during its first flyby
MESSENGER's view of Mercury during its first flyby Because of Mercury's very slow rotation, only one hemisphere of Mercury is Sunlit during any Mercury flyby. This image shows what areas of Mercury were Sunlit during MESSENGER's first flyby of Mercury in January, 2008. Both images were taken with the wide-angle camera. The right-hand image of a crescent Mercury is the inbound view, with the Sun reaching around to the dusk terminator at 275° east longitude. The left-hand image of a gibbous Mercury is MESSENGER's outbound view, with the dawn terminator at 95° east. Topography on Mercury's surface is only visible near the dawn and dusk terminators, where Sunlight falls at a slating angle across Mercury's surface, casting long shadows from cliffs. Away from the terminator, topography is lost, but more variations in brightness and darkness (or "albedo") of the surface are revealed.Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW

MESSENGER flew by Mercury at 19:04:42 UTC (11:04:42 PST) on January 14, 2008. It approached with a crescent view of the planet. On approach, all the Sunlit terrain visible to MESSENGER's cameras was terrain that had been previously imaged by Mariner 10 more than 30 years ago. MESSENGER's closest approach was on Mercury's night side. As it departed, its view was of a gibbous Mercury, with Sunlight on areas of Mercury never imaged by Mariner 10. It took several days to return all the images and data from the encounter, but as of today, all the science data from the encounter is safely on Earth.

Seeing Mercury Afresh

Vivaldi crater and environs from MESSENGER
Vivaldi crater and environs from MESSENGER MESSENGER took this image of Mercury on January 14, 2008 at 18:06, about an hour before the closest approach of its first flyby. The image is one frame from a 55-image mosaic of Mercury's crescent. The most prominent feature in the image is the double-ringed Vivaldi crater and its rays of secondary craters. The outer ring of Vivaldi is about 200 kilometers in diameter. Other craters in the image display a variety of degradation states; some are deep bowls with sharp central peaks, while others are flat-floored, so must have been filled in (most likely by volcanic eruptions).Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW
Vivaldi crater and environs from Mariner 10
Vivaldi crater and environs from Mariner 10 Mariner 10 took the images for this mosaic (166766 and 166767) on September 21, 1974 at 21:13 and 21:14 UTC as it was departing from its second flyby of Mercury.Image: NASA / JPL-Caltech / Emily Lakdawalla

"We're poring over the pictures, and there's spectacular things to see, not just on the unseen side, but also on the 'seen' side," Chapman says. "We're actually really surprised that the pictures we have of the side of Mercury that we've seen before reveal much greater detail than Mariner 10." Mariner 10 had a television camera, while MESSENGER carries a modern CCD camera that provides much sharper images. However, the difference in detail has at least as much to do with the angle of the Sun as it does with the differences between cameras. Chapman pointed to a picture of a crater, Vivaldi, that had been imaged by Mariner 10, seen anew in a MESSENGER image. Chapman says that the Mariner 10 image "revealed a circular feature, but you could see no topography at all. Many of the things around this crater were completely invisible in Mariner 10 images."

"The lighting angle makes all the difference," Chapman continued. "Many parts of Mercury that have 'been seen' by Mariner 10 have been seen with high Sun, so you see no topography at all, and you miss very large craters. For looking at all the colors and brightness of the surface, high Sun is good, but for looking at geology, you want low Sun." Mariner 10 had no chance to observe different parts of Mercury at different Sun angles because its mission consisted of three brief flybys of the planet, all at the same time in Mercury's solar day. And Mercury rotates so slowly that the Sun angle changed almost not at all during each individual encounter. As a result, although Mariner 10 flew by Mercury three times, it saw only one half of Mercury's surface Sunlit, and of that half, only a tiny area ringing the planet's dawn-dusk boundary was seen with low Sun angles sufficient to show Mercury's topography. MESSENGER's three flybys of Mercury will have a similar problem, covering only a tiny portion of Mercury's surface at low Sun angles. However, once MESSENGER enters orbit, Chapman says it will image spots on Mercury at a variety of Sun angles, both high and low, permitting both the study of Mercury's surface coloration and the study of its topography.

Scientists are just beginning to form their first speculative ideas about the new features of Mercury that MESSENGER has revealed, and are being cautious about expressing those speculations publicly. However, Chapman predicted that "there's plenty of discoveries coming in the near future." Part of the science team's caution results from the fact that it's all too easy to see features on Mercury that look similar to other places in the solar system and assume that the same processes prevailed.

Mercury's unseen side
Mercury's unseen side MESSENGER captured this view of a part of Mercury not seen by Mariner 10 on January 14, 2008 at 20:02 UTC, about an hour after the closest approach of its flyby. The image illustrates the complexity of crosscutting relationships among craters, lava flows, and fault scarps that geologists will tease apart throughout MESSENGER's mission. Some craters are fresh, some filled in with lava; many fault scarps cut across the image, often slicing through crater walls, but in some cases the craters disrupt the scarps.Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW

But Mercury is a different planet with a unique and complex geologic history that will only slowly be unraveled, says MASCS instrument scientist Noam Izenberg. "Everywhere you look, there's something new. It's beyond words. New views of things -- types of craters we haven't seen before -- things similar to what we've seen on the Moon, but they'renot, or similar to Mars, but they're not." As one example, Izenberg pointed out that Mercury has a lunar-like crater density, where fresher craters overlap older craters which overlap older craters, a state that leads scientists to conclude that Mercury's surface has seen little significant geologic activity for most of the age of the solar system. Yet, in some places, among the craters, there are smoother "intercrater plains" that have somehow had their craters erased.

The high-resolution image below illustrates the challenges faced by the science team in interpreting Mercury's history. Near the bottom is a large, relatively fresh crater with a terraced rim. Terraces form in such craters immediately after the impact, as the steep wall of the crater collapses and slides inward. This collapse and slumping should have produced a rough crater floor, yet the interior of the crater is quite smooth but for a few small craters. Outside the crater, the surrounding plains are peppered by chains of secondary impact craters that formed with the large crater as blocks of ejecta sprayed outward from the impact site and slammed to ground. One way to understand the relative timing of the impact event and whatever geologic activity smoothed out the crater's interior floor, geologists will count the craters that formed on the large crater's ejecta blanket and compare that number with the count of small craters that have formed on the large crater's smooth floor. However, to do that, they must determine which of the small craters outside the large one were secondary to the original impact, and which ones came much later. The caption released with the image sums up the challenge: "these flat-floored craters both illuminate and confound the study of the geological history of Mercury."

Complex cratering relationships on Mercury
Complex cratering relationships on Mercury This mosaic of two images was captured by MESSENGER shortly after its closest approach to its first flyby of Mercury on January 14, 2008. The image is about 370 kilometers (230 miles) across. It shows part of a large, fresh crater with secondary crater chains located near Mercury's equator on the side of the planet not seen by Mariner 10. Large, flat-floored craters often have terraced rims from post-impact collapse of their newly formed walls. The hundreds of secondary impactors that are excavated from the planet's surface by the incoming object create long, linear crater chains radial to the main crater. These chains, in addition to the rest of the ejecta blanket, create the complicated, hilly terrain surrounding the primary crater. By counting craters on the ejecta blanket that have formed since the impact event, the age of the crater can be estimated. This count can then be compared with a similar count for the crater floor to determine whether any material has partially filled the crater since its formation. With their large size and production of abundant secondary craters, these flat-floored craters both illuminate and confound the study of the geological history of Mercury.Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW

Now that all the data is safely on the ground, the science teams are madly calibrating it and attempting to make sense of it. Even at this very preliminary stage, there are surprises, Izenberg explains. His primary responsibility is for an instrument called MASCS, which consists of two spectrometers, which read how brightly solar radiation is reflected from points on Mercury's surface and in its extremely thin atmosphere, information that can eventually be translated into measurements of the mineral composition of the surface and gas species in the atmosphere. "We've completed the initial calibration to take a look at the spectra of the surface. The ground track was mostly equatorial, and crossed over some interesting stuff. We also had a good couple hundred spectra just to the south and east of the crater Mozart. Those areas were seen [in images from] Mariner 10 as well as MESSENGER during the flyby, so we can do some direct comparison of the imaging and mineral composition of parts of the surface. We clearly see some variations."

Fresh rayed crater on Mercury
Fresh rayed crater on Mercury This is the 98th of 99 images in a mosaic of Mercury's northern hemisphere captured by MESSENGER as it receded from its first flyby of the planet, on January 14, 2008 at 19:41 UTC. The sharp edges and bright rays of the crater in the upper left of the image indicate that it formed much later in Mercury's history than most of the other features visible in this image. Sunlight is coming in from high over Mercury in this particular view, so topographic features are not very obvious; instead, brightness and darkness variations across the surface result from local differences in color, composition, and/or texture. The image is about 370 kilometers across.Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW

It's too early in the calibration process to say much about what those variations mean, but Izenberg provided a teaser: variations in albedo (the brightness and darkness of the surface) seem to be more extreme than he expected. "There are some really, really bright spots and some really, really dark craters, too. On a local scale, there seem to be some fairly strong variations in albedo. On the whole, the planet is fairly uniform, but there are different spots that are quite striking."

Threading the Needle

All of MESSENGER's science plans had to be orchestrated months in advance, down to the precise angles at which the cameras would be pointed to capture these images. The last adjustment to MESSENGER's pre-flyby trajectory took place on December 19, 2007, nearly a month before the Mercury encounter. Even slight errors in the position or timing of MESSENGER's close approach could disrupt the carefully planned imaging sequences, causing Mercury to be out of its expected position in the camera frame.

Fortunately, MESSENGER's targeting was spectacularly precise, as MESSENGER mission design engineer Jim McAdams explains. "The distance between the target and actual periapsis [close approach] points was 8.25 kilometers [5.13 miles]. The difference between target altitude (200.07 kilometers) and reconstructed altitude (201.50 kilometers) was 1.43 kilometers [0.89 miles]. It's like sending an object from Miami, Florida to Seattle, Washington and missing the target 'keyhole' by 6.4 centimeters [2.5 inches]." The precision in MESSENGER's targeting translated directly to precision in pointing of its instruments for MESSENGER's science observations; McAdams provided the following illustration of predicted (left) and actual (right) appearance of one of MESSENGER's high-resolution images of a small area on the edge of Mercury's crescent, taken as MESSENGER approached the planet.

Predicted and actual positions of MESSENGER flyby images
Predicted and actual positions of MESSENGER flyby images The pointing of MESSENGER's cameras was fixed nearly a month before the flyby. The flyby was almost exactly on target, so the actual positions of MESSENGER image frames barely deviated from what was planned.Image: NASA / JHUAPL / CIW

Over the next two weeks, the MESSENGER team plans to release images at the rate of a few per day; a post-flyby press conference with initial results is currently planned for January 30. But the date that most of the science team members are looking forward to is their first presentation of MESSENGER's first data from Mercury to their peers, at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, convened in Houston, Texas on March 10-14. The mission will next encounter Mercury on October 6, 2008, when nearly the opposite hemisphere will be sunlit.

BepiColombo at Mercury (separated view)
BepiColombo at Mercury (separated view) Image: ESA - AOES Medialab

It's taken three and a half years since launch for MESSENGER to arrive at its first Mercury encounter, and it will be three more years until it goes into orbit. In all, 36 years will have elapsed between Mariner 10's initial reconnaissance of the planet and the orbit insertion of Mercury's first artificial satellite. Mercury will not have to wait so long for its next visitor, however. The European Space Agency (ESA) announced today the signing of a contract to mark the start of design and build of the next mission to Mercury, the BepiColombo mission. BepiColombo will deliver two spacecraft to Mercury orbit, one built by ESA and one to be provided by the Japanese space agency, JAXA. Launch is planned for August 2013, well after the end of MESSENGER's prime mission, and arrival for 2019.

Let’s Go Beyond The Horizon

Every success in space exploration is the result of the community of space enthusiasts, like you, who believe it is important. You can help usher in the next great era of space exploration with your gift today.

Donate Today