Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Stuart Atkinson

A right old comet kerfuffle…

Posted by Stuart Atkinson

18-07-2014 12:02 CDT

Topics: Rosetta and Philae, pretty pictures, comets, amateur image processing, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

This article originally appeared on Stuart Atkinson's blog and is reposted here with his permission.


If you have a passion for – or even just a passing interest in – space exploration, you’re probably aware that a robotic European Space Agency (ESA) space probe, “Rosetta”, is currently closing in on a comet. The comet’s full name is “Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko” but many space enthusiasts are shortening that to “Cherry Gerry”, or “Comet CG” or just plain “67P” (which is what I’ll call it here from now on, okay?) This is one of the most exciting space missions for a long, long time, because not only will the Rosetta probe take high-resolution images of the comet’s surface from August, but in November it will set a small lander, “Philae”, down on its nucleus, which will then send back the first ever pictures from the surface of a comet. Obviously this is a seriously giddying prospect, not just for planetary and cometary scientists, who have longed to see a comet’s surface properly for decades, but also for “armchair” space explorers, the countless tens (hundreds?) of thousands of people around the globe who live and breathe space missions, and spend hours looking at the images sent back from across the solar system. So as Rosetta closes in on Comet 67P a lot of people are getting very excited. Big missions like this, when something completely new is seen for the first time, don’t come along very often now.

Rosetta and Philae at the comet

ESA - C. Carreau / ATG medialab

Rosetta and Philae at the comet

There are lots of serious science questions for Rosetta to answer once she arrives. What is the comet made of? How much dust is coming off it? How old is it? In which part of the solar system did it form, all those billions of years ago? But let’s be honest, as exciting as this “hard science” will be, really, as the August 6th rendezvous approaches, everyone – professional scientist and “space geek” alike – is wondering the same thing: what will the comet nucleus look like up close? Will it have craters and dusty plains, like those seen on other comets in the past? Will giant boulders litter its surface? Will it have hills, or even mountains, casting stark shadows when the Sun slips behind them? What will we SEE?

Outside of the so-called “astronomical community” there is a lot of public interest in this mission too. It’s fair to say that promoting its missions, and engaging the public with those missions, is something ESA has been rather poor at in the past, but now they’re really doing well. For months now the European Space Agency team responsible for publicising and promoting the Rosetta mission has been doing an absolutely fantastic job, promoting Rosetta with competitions, multiple websites and countless Outreach activities and events, and thanks to their tireless efforts on social media the mission has a very solid presence on Twitter and Facebook. Scientists involved in the mission have been blogging about it too. This all means that Rosetta has probably the highest online presence of any ESA mission to date, a great achievement considering that the ESA Outreach team has had to do all this with a limited budget and a small number of people. They deserve huge congratulations for their efforts.

But money and manpower aside, their greatest problem has inevitably been a lack of actual pictures of the mission’s cometary target, 67P. The comet’s icy nucleus is so small, and has been so far away from the probe, that until this week it has looked like just a few pixels on a black background. A few days ago, with the gap between comet and probe shrinking daily, ESA put out “the latest” images of the comet, and although it looked larger than we had seen it before it was still just a blurry, smudgy… something. Tantalising views, certainly, but 67P was not looking much like a comet, to be honest.

Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko spins into view

ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA

Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko spins into view
This animation of Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko was created from 36 images captured by Rosetta on June 27 and 28. The comet makes a revolution every 12.4 hours.

Then a couple of days ago, everything changed.

If you were online during Wednesday you probably felt a strange disturbance in the Force… as if thousands of space exploration enthusiasts suddenly cried out in delight, only to be suddenly silenced a short time later. Why? Because suddenly, out of the blue, apparently published by accident, new images of 67/P appeared online, and they were radically different from anything seen before…

Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta on July 11, 2014

ESA / Rosetta / MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / SSO / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA

Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta on July 11, 2014
As Rosetta approached its target comet, the shape of the nucleus was revealed to be a contact binary -- two unequal-sized objects in contact with each other. All together, the object is about 4 by 3.5 kilometers in size.

Memories of a confusing cluster of pixels were instantly banished as we all gazed at the strange object on our screens. Instead of looking like a single body, like a classic asteroid or comet, 67P looked like two bodies stuck together, or a single large body with two very distinct parts. Straight away astronomy journalists and armchair explorers alike were speculating that 67P might be what astronomers call a “contact binary”, which is a fancy way of saying “it’s made of two once separate bits which bumped together and stuck”. Great! Two comets for the price of one!!

But steady on. There are other possibilities. Maybe it’s a single body with a narrow waist, like a peanut, or the pictures are still of such low quality they’re giving totally the wrong impression But “contact binary” seems to be the most popular interpretation of the images so far. As ever, we’ll just have to wait and see…

Looking back, I think it’s fair to say that there was quite a mood of euphoria for a while that day, as those images – still blurry, but waaay better than anything we had seen before – spread across the internet like a brand new video clip of a sleeping kitten cuddling up to a puppy under a Christmas tree. After all the months of just seeing Rosetta’s target as a pixelated “What the hell is THAT??” blob, suddenly it was a very real, very solid object. “Look at that,” I thought, looking at the images on my phone, “67P is a real world…” Rosetta was going to explore and study a real world! Oh, yes, there was much rejoicing throughout the space exploration community -

But not, it seems, within ESA. The images had been released unofficially and prematurely. Soon they had vanished from the CNES webpage, rounded up and put back in their barns, and the sound of the doors slamming firmly shut behind them echoed across Europe. But it was too late. By then the images had been saved by countless space enthusiasts and were already being pasted into reports on numerous websites. The cat wasn’t just out of the bag, it was halfway down the street and had no intention of coming back…

Of course, ESA’s image cull prompted quite a response too. Twitter, Facebook and forums were soon groaning under the weight of varying opinions and reactions. Some people said “Ok, fair enough, they were released without permission, we should wait for the official release”. But others shook their heads in frustration, and disappointment, and thought gloomily “Here we go again – ESA is going to hold back images again…”

Again? Yes, again. You see, in the past – in stark contrast to NASA, which releases raw images from its Mars rovers and Saturn orbiter “Cassini” in real time, sometimes posting them on websites just hours after they were taken – ESA has been, shall we say, “reluctant” to let the public see more than a handful of images taken by its probes at the time they were taken. This has led to a lot of criticism and even anger. And, cards on the table here, it’s a policy which really, really hacks me off personally.

ESA has always answered that criticism by insisting that it was their policy to not release more images until the scientists working on the missions had had time to study them and do science with them. And ok, that’s fair enough; if you were a scientist who had dedicated years, if not decades of your career to a space mission, the last thing you want is to be “scooped” by non-scientists playing about with your images on their laptops while sat in bed in their pyjamas. How chuffed would YOU be if someone tapping away on their tablet spotted something interesting on one of YOUR photos before YOU’D had a chance to look at it properly..?

But looking at it from the other side, many ask if it’s fair for ESA to hoard its images in this way when those images are paid for with public money. European governments fund ESA, and Governments get their money from taxing their citizens, so while a lot of private money goes into them – space exploration is big business across Europe, and many hi-tech companies have invested huge amounts of money in it – every ESA mission is paid for, at least in part, out of money taken from hard working people’s wage packets. Surely the people who pay for the images to be taken have the right to see them – not all of them, but at least a good number of them – when they are taken? At a very fundamental level, how can it be fair for ESA to hoard their images on their hard drives when there are thousands and thousands of people desperate to see them – people who paid to have those images taken in the first place?

These aren’t just my arguments, by the way. These points are made so often about ESA missions that they’ve become a bit of a thorn in the space agency’s side and they can’t ignore them anymore. And by yesterday evening one of the Rosetta team had put out a very detailed and honest blog post, again explaining the Rosetta (and general ESA) image release policy. Basically it just repeats the familiar arguments about ESA scientists needing time to study the images before they are released, and ends by saying, in as many words, “Hey, don’t blame us; this way of doing things was agreed by the countries who contribute money to ESA. It’s just the way things are…”

Yeah, well, sorry to be rude, but “the way things are” sucks. It needs to change. Because if ESA drip feed the public Rosetta images after spending all these months – and a lot of money – building up public excitement and expectation through all that brilliant Outreach work, they’re not just going to look selfish, but they’re going to risk losing a lot of the goodwill they’ve built up too.

Yesterday ESA officially released “the latest” images of 67P, which were put into an animation to show it rotating…

Rotating view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 14 July 2014

ESA / Rosetta / MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / SSO / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA

Rotating view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 14 July 2014
On July 14, 2014, Rosetta's OSIRIS camera captured these 36 images of the rotating nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The original images contained only about 20 to 30 pixels across the comet's disk; they have been substantially enlarged here, so fine details are more likely to be artifacts than actual features. The images do suggest that the comet may consist of two parts: one segment seems to be rather elongated, while the other appears more bulbous.

…and although they show only a little more detail than the “bootleg” images released the day before – even though some people claim to have brought out surface detail in the photographs using image processing software, the comet and probe are still so far apart that actual surface features can’t be resolved yet – in a way that doesn’t matter. What matters most at the moment is that the comet’s bizarre shape has been revealed. Look at the images yourself and you’ll appreciate why it has been compared by many people to a “Rubber Duckie” (or just plain old “Rubber Duck” as we call them here in the UK, without that “Duckie” nonsense! :-) ) , and that rather irreverent nickname appears to be popular amongst science writers, too.

So, the excitement is definitely building. From now on every new set of images will show more and more detail, and it won’t be long before the Rosetta scientists will have good enough images to enable them to begin charting and naming features like craters, mountains and valleys on the comet’s surface. But it seems that we will have to wait for those images too. Everything coming out of ESA in the wake of “Rubber Duckie Gate” suggests that ESA is sticking to its guns and is only going to release images of 67P in spurts.

It may be a week until we see any more Rosetta images, which is quite ridiculous in my opinion. I actually feel quite mad thinking about that.

But why do I feel so strongly about this? After all, people like me have no God-given right to see the images taken by Rosetta or other space probes. Well, that’s true, but as one of those aforementioned “armchair explorers” – and also a very active “Outreach Educator”, who regularly gives illustrated talks on space and astronomy to public groups – I think it’s only fair I be allowed to see them, and use them.

“Yes, Stu,” I hear some of you sighing, “but WHY???”

Well, whilst I obviously recognise the value and importance of the hard science returned by space probes and missions – you know, the squiggly-lined graphs, Powerpoint charts and bizarre, Rorschach test-like splodges of chemical composition and spectroscopy readings – to be perfectly honest, my passion is for images, or “pretty pictures” as they’re often dismissed. I think this is because of my background as an amateur astronomer, children’s astronomy writer, and Outreach worker. I enjoy standing in a muddy or frosty field on a dark night and actually looking up at the stars, bathing in the light of the Milky Way as it arches overhead. I love staring into the eyepiece of my small but trusty 4.5” reflecting telescope and seeing Saturn’s rings, the Moon’s craters and Jupiter’s four largest moons for myself. I delight in standing in front of a room full of people, young or old, and showing them pictures of Valles Marineris, the icy landscape of Titan or the Earth rising above the charcoal-black limb of the Moon. I’m a visual person, guilty as charged. I’m sure others go all weak at the knees when they see a graph or a chart but for me a picture is worth a million graphs or charts, never mind a thousand words.

And I’m not alone feeling that way. There are millions of people just like me “out here”, and more “space enthusiasts” are taking part in the exploration of space from their school desks, office chairs or bedrooms every week, via the internet.

Which is why I have such a problem with ESA’s image release policy. It’s a dinosaur policy, drafted in the pre-internet world, when, to be honest, it didn’t matter if images were released promptly or not because the vast majority of the general public really didn’t give a monkey’s about what the wild-haired space boffins holed up in their labs got up to. There was hardly any science on TV, or in the newspapers or magazines, or at least nowhere near as much as we enjoy now. In those days probably only a few tens of thousands people around the world waited breathlessly to see the Voyager images of Jupiter, or the Viking images of Mars. In many ways it was a science-starved world.

Well, we don’t live in that world any more, despite what some people involved with ESA apparently think. Today huge numbers of the public voraciously devour science, and want to participate in the great adventures taking place out there. Unable to physically go along for the ride, they are happy instead to follow the missions online, regularly checking their websites, blogs, Facebook pages and Twitter feeds. Each FB post, each Tweet, each link clicked on makes them feel that little bit more connected to those missions, and happy to support future (expensive) missions too.

Now let me state here very clearly, so no-one accuses me of having anything personal against ESA, that I am very proud of the European space program and all it has achieved. I’ve grown up with the successes of Hubble, Huygens, Mars Express, Giotto and other ESA missions. They’re all fantastic achievements, and have given space science just as much as NASA’s possibly more-famous flagship missions such as Voyager and the MERs. But my loyalty to ESA is not blind. I firmly believe ESA has to have a rethink here, and get a real grip on Outreach in the 21st century. It really, really needs to do better.

I’ve already acknowledged that ESA has nowhere near the Outreach resources NASA does, and I’m not suggesting it tries to catch up. What I am suggesting is that they do better with what they have, and at least try to make sure people “out here” are more involved in their space missions and are allowed to see the results of the programs they have paid for. To put it plainly, ESA needs to become more generous with its images, because – in my opinion – at the moment, by withholding images like it does, it comes across as cold and detached from the very people who fund and support it.

ESA simply has to become more aware of the importance and value of releasing images into the public domain as quickly, and as freely, as possible. Today ESA – like NASA – has countless websites, and those websites frequently display images taken by space-probes during encounters and fly-bys etc, and when they appear they’re always gorgeous and brilliant and right-click saveable. But compared to NASA, ESA seems to drip feed the public, and the media, its images, almost as if it begrudges sharing them sometimes.

Actually, if you dig a little deeper it becomes clear that the problem seems to lie not with the Agency itself, but with some of the scientists in charge of the instruments involved or the missions themselves. They’re still living in the Dark Ages; they just don’t “get” that releasing their images into the wild is A Good Thing. Each image has to be prised from their hands, which is not good, not good at all.

Again, I have to stress that I have no bad will towards ESA. Far from it; I know from the email correspondence I have enjoyed with many ESA scientists in the past, and from my daily interactions with them now on both Facebook and Twitter, that they are hard-working, dedicated, and enthusiastic people who love sharing their successes with the wider world. I’m sure many of the Rosetta team would love to see more of its images being enjoyed “out here” by members of the public. But there is a serious problem somewhere within ESA that is letting them down, and needs addressing. And that problem seems to me to be that some of the people in charge of ESA missions don’t “get it” that space science isn’t just for space scientists any more, it’s fascinating to a growing number of ordinary people too, and these are the same people who fund ESA’s ambitious and successful – and unsuccessful – missions through their taxes.

I honestly think Rosetta’s historic comet rendezvous demands changes in ESA’s image release policy.

And come on, it has to change, because the world has changed. I’m not sure if the people guarding the gates of the Rosetta image vaults even know this, but Out Here there is now an energetic and thriving community of space enthusiasts who have amazing image manipulation talents and skills, who will happily spend hours and hours taking the raw images and, by enhancing them, adding colour, stitching them together and generally tweaking them, turn them into quite amazing celestial portraits.

And the key word there is “raw”. The images we want to see are the untouched ones, the grainy, blurry, speckly artefact-riddled images returned by space probes which the mission scientists then calibrate and clean up and turn into useful, hard data, data they then work with to write their papers and advance their careers. I seriously question the ESA concerns that its scientists can be “scooped” by enthusiasts working on such raw images because apparently NASA doesn’t have any problems with this. In fact, NASA openly encourages people to become involved in its missions by posting raw images taken by its Mars rovers and Saturn-orbiting Cassini probe online as soon as they can. NASA is happy, for the most part, for people sitting in their pyjamas or on trains to take the raw images and use them to create new and beautiful works of art for everyone to enjoy.

ESA needs to embrace this philosophy too, if it is to connect better with the public and ensure their support for its missions continue, especially in this difficult time of austerity. Even I sometimes find it very hard to justify the money spent on space exploration when so many people don’t have enough to eat, or a roof over their head. The answer to such criticism is to ask people to consider The Bigger Picture, to explain to them that space exploration enriches us all and adds to our knowledge. Proving that is hard, very hard, but showing a jaw-droppingly gorgeous picture of an achingly-blue martian sunset, or Earth glinting like a sapphire beneath Saturn’s glowing rings, or an asteroid tumbling through the darkness of space can help enormously. People don’t “get” scientific diagrams. I’ve yet to hear the audience at one of my talks let out an appreciative sigh when shown a Powerpoint slide of a spiky graph showing the changing seasonal rate of methane production on Mars. But put up an image of Earth taken from space, glowing, burning bright blue against the blackness of the void like a fragile Christmas tree bauble and the response is amazing.

People like pictures. They can appreciate pictures. That’s why pictures are a space agency’s best asset. To take them and not make the most of them you possibly can is foolish.

As a space enthusiast and member of that public I don’t ask for much. I don’t want to sit in on planning or funding or engineering meetings, or be sent thousand page reports or technical papers, or vote on spending and funding. I trust people at ESA to handle those things. But I want to see at least a good number of the pictures I’ve contributed to financially soon after they’ve been taken, instead of just gnawing on a few scraps thrown from the top table, long after they’ve gone cold. Personally I don’t think that’s unreasonable, is it?

I can’t help thinking – melodramatically, I know – that by keeping back images like it does, ESA’s behaving like a photographer that was paid – very well – in advance for photographing a friend’s wedding, then used that money to buy the most expensive camera he could find and spent hours taking pictures, only to hand over a handful of prints instead of the full album he promised, before walking away with the camera too…

It might sound selfish, me just wanting to see a picture of my favourite planet, or a comet, or whatever, but there’s a bigger picture here. It’s not just about me, it’s not even about us, the current space enthusiasts – it’s about the next “us”. Every time I give a talk in a school I try fan the flames of the kids’ interest in the hope that I’ll inspire one of them to go grab a book off a shelf and learn a bit more after I’ve gone. I’ve been giving school talks for (oh my god!!!) almost 30 years now, must have talked to many thousands of kids in that time, and hopefully some of them have gone on to study and work in science, maybe even space exploration, I don’t know. But it’s such a visual topic, space exploration, that it’s absolutely essential to have the latest pics to show the kids, or they won’t believe that space exploration is going on NOW, and wasn’t all finished in the days of Apollo, as they’re taught in history, I can’t stress that enough.

Steve Squyres, the man behind the fantastically successful Mars rovers, has said that he was inspired to enter a career as a space scientist by those famous Viking images of Mars. The same thing happened to me, only in my case the images were in a paint-stained copy of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC tossed into a corner of my art class and forgotten about until an inquisitive 16yr old found it and… um… sneaked it home to look at it in private.

I’ve still got it, over there on the “Mars” shelf of my bookcase. I have kept it all this time, even though it’s battered and faded now, because pictures are important. They speak to us. An amazing image – of anything, a crying child, a beautiful sunset, a comet seen by a passing space-probe – can reach out of our computer and TV screens, and up off our newspaper and magazine pages, and bury itself into our brains and hearts and never leave. ESA has to realise that the images it takes are treasures to be shared with everyone, as quickly and as fully as possible, not just because – despite what they think – they have an obligation to let the people who paid for those images to be taken see them, but because they have a chance to inspire and educate people with them too. I’m seriously not sure that the Outreach potential of ESA’s images is fully appreciated yet. Rosetta’s historic comet encounter should – has to be – the event which triggers changes.

I know that the situation within ESA regarding image release is much more complicated than it is in NASA. As I said earlier, ESA mission scientists are not obliged to share their data in the same way, and some prefer to withhold it from the public and the media until it has been analysed to within an inch of its life. The people behind individual instruments can demand data release delays too. But this attitude has to change, and the scientists and researchers involved in missions need to be made aware of how important a change to a more generous image release policy is.

Unfortunately I don’t think they’re going to make that change willingly; I think they’re going to have to be made to change.

How we get them to change, though, I don’t know. Echoing my own thoughts and concerns, a German astronomy enthusiasts have sent an open letter to ESA calling for a more generous Rosetta image release policy during the encounter with 67P – which is very appropriate seeing as many of the scientists involved in taking, and releasing, Rosetta images are German – but their appeal seems to have been shrugged off. So what else can we do? Well, on our Facebook pages and in our Tweets we can keep making the case for more images to be shared. We can keep this subject alive in our blog posts and forum discussions, too. Other than that, I don’t know.

One word sums it up, really: share. ESA needs to share what it does with the world better; if you put more images out more quickly, you can then just sit back and bask in the glow as the fruits of ESA’s labours are enjoyed, and celebrated, all around the globe. It’s not, um, rocket science.

ESA is a space agency to be proud of, and I am, but to be honest sometimes I don’t feel a part of it. Sometimes I feel like I’m not wanted by ESA. As much as I admire ESA’s programs, I actually feel more a part of NASA’s programs. I would really, really like that to change, and I think that a change to ESA’s antiquated image release policy would go a long way towards making a lot of people like me feel more a part of ESA. Just by being a bit more approachable and a bit more open to sharing, ESA could make many people like me even more proud of our space agency than we already are.

Throughout history comets have been seen as omens of evil. Wars, plagues and disasters have all been blamed on bright comets after they appeared in the sky, and even today many people believe comets are heralds of change and upheaval. Comet 67P will undoubtedly bring about great change and upheaval in the world of astronomy when Rosetta’s cameras and instruments have completed their studies, leaving us with a new understanding of the nature of these enigmatic icy bodies.

Let’s hope that 67P brings about change within ESA itself, too.

 
See other posts from July 2014

 

Or read more blog entries about: Rosetta and Philae, pretty pictures, comets, amateur image processing, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Comments:

Saul Cohen: 07/18/2014 12:30 CDT

Well put! I wrote a blog comment along these same lines on the Rosetta article discussing this, but it mysteriously vanished into the bit bucket. One thing I argued that I don't see here is that the scientists do need some kind of protection and motivation for sharing their hard-won data. I've been in a position where I had shareable data (not with the public, but with the rest of my scientific community), and we did embargo it for yearlong timescales. Frankly, our jobs depended on it. No amount of goodwill toward the public is going to make a scientist commit career suicide, and it is absolutely essential that the community (journals, universities, whatever) create an environment in which a culture of sharing is rewarded rather than punished.

Laszlo Molnar: 07/18/2014 01:25 CDT

From the space enthusiast perspective, I wholeheartedly agree with you. However, from the scientist's view, I sense some misunderstanding: proprietary periods are NOT against sincere enthusiasts, rather against other scientists. Raw images in this cas ARE hard data, and the science team wants to work with them first. Also, pay attention to this bit: "when it comes to the big "events" like the comet rendezvous on 6 August, the landing in November, and the perihelion passage in August next year, we aim to put out the very best images taken right on those days as quickly as possible, much as we did for Rosetta's fly-bys of asteroids Steins and Lutetia." A final point: people always seem to draw parallels with Cassini and the Mars rovers, but in reality several NASA missions keep using proprietary periods: the Mars orbiters, Messenger, Dawn (IIRC...), etc. And I vividly remember the kerfuffle about the Kepler data - they went as far as intentionally garbling the data they provided to international partners (ask any astronomer about the Planetary Transit Filter). (Disclaimer: I did my PhD from Kepler data.) So no NASA is not out of the dark ages either. And the PLATO mission opted for no closed periods - take it as a sign of change within ESA.

BBCAmos: 07/18/2014 01:38 CDT

There’s been quite a bit of talk in recent days about the Rosetta image policy and the “dinosaurs” at ESA, but it’s worth bearing a few points in mind. ESA works in different ways to NASA. It is beholden to its member states, and its missions and polices are carried through at the behest of those member states. The instruments, including the cameras, on Rosetta are the contributions/property of particular member states, as is the data they produce. The OSIRIS camera system is a German contribution run by the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research. So, it is the Germans who are in control of the pictures, and ESA publishes those pictures only with the permission and agreement of the German team. So be careful when you say, “ESA needs to become more generous with its images”, or “ask if it’s fair for ESA to hoard its images”. These are not ESA’s images to give away. Just as I am tied to the licences and restrictions the BBC has agreed with picture agencies, so ESA must also operate within the limits it has been set by its member states. The questions you raise in your post, Stuart, are very important; and the points you make are very powerful, but they also need to be directed to the right place - to the member state agencies such as DLR, CNES and UKSA. If the German team would only release more pictures to the communications team at ESA, then I'm sure ESA could do an even better job of engagement on Rosetta than they are doing right now. As you probably know, I spend a good deal of my time reporting on ESA, and its actions often make me bang my head on the desk. But it's been tripped up this week by events over which it hasn't had a lot of control.

Mark Adler: 07/18/2014 03:59 CDT

As Stuart mentioned, the release of images can be done in a way that does not threaten the ability of the science team to get first dibs on the papers. 1. Only release uncalibrated images. No calibration data, no geometric data, no vehicle context data, etc., which makes them almost useless for an investigation. 2. Compress them moderately to jpegs, unavoidably adding some level of artifacts rendering them less useful scientifically as compared to the originals, which are compressed much less using different techniques. 3. The full science data should be released periodically within six months to a year after acquisition, which ends the monopoly that the science team has on those observations.

Anonymous: 07/18/2014 04:13 CDT

I do agree that this is the best outreach ESA has ever done, but it wasn't that high a bar to top. It sure looks like Hyperion found a dance partner, and gonna be difficult to keep this from being called the "rubber duckie" comet from now on, and a real danger that Rosetta and lander will become "Bert and Ernie" tag too......

jb.vincent: 07/19/2014 05:00 CDT

Hi, Rosetta scientist here. "It may be a week until we see any more Rosetta images, which is quite ridiculous in my opinion. I actually feel quite mad thinking about that." I have seen this type of comment all over the Internet and it annoys me a lot. How can you expect more frequent releases when we are only imaging the nucleus once a week ! I don't know what will be the press schedule after we enter the mapping orbit, but for now you see as much of the nucleus as we (the scientists) have seen.

Mark Zambelli: 07/19/2014 06:00 CDT

Nope, I'm still caught right in the middle of wanting to see more yet not wanting any career-damaging data releases. I'm a Brit and yes we are spoiled with NASAs quick output but for only a very select few missions... the majority of missions use the protected delays and we live by those rules. I'm glad it was mentioned by jb.vincent above as the one thing that has been forgotten in all the kerfuffle is how often the images are aquired. We were all told weeks ago that Rosetta will be taking images on a weekly basis and that the best of the bunch would be released during this approach phase. ESA are giving us exactly what they said they would. Trying to find the balance in all things is hard and this is no different; yes I'd love to be drowning in new image releases in the future but finding the right line will be challenging... insatiable appetites come in a spectrum too and it will be impossible to please everyone. Now, all I have to do is be patient until next week... exciting times!

David Frankis: 07/19/2014 07:42 CDT

I'm confused. If Rosetta are, in fact, releasing what they've got (as per jb.vincent and Mark Zambelli above) then why invoke the proprietary period? Why not just say so?

Marco: 07/19/2014 07:22 CDT

I am satisfied that at this point, withholding images actually increases the anticipation and expectation! Like a football enthusiast not knowing the result of a match thereby enjoying the replay more. I think "leaks" are the only effective counter to the establishment if it becomes like a conspiracy, and that has happened to my satisfaction on at least the Eureka moment of the confirmation that it is "binary" in nature. Perhaps other leaks may follow - here's hoping !

Marco: 07/19/2014 07:28 CDT

Like when they confirm the existence of liquid water under the surface. They will have a lot of trouble stopping that kind of information from "leaking":-)

Techhistory: 07/20/2014 10:06 CDT

4,800 words to complain and not a single word on how to change the status quo? If this article was an attempt at changing the status quo it failed. Rather some bland statement that ESA defends some anonymous principal investigators, a quick Google search for Rosetta's OSIRIS camera shows that Dr. Holger Sierks, at the Max-Planck Institute is the OSIRIS Principal Investigator Phone:+49 551 384 979-242 Sierks@mps.mpg.de How about a series of polite emails to Dr. Sierks from those who are interested in getting the Max-Planck Institute into the 21st century. I've just sent mine.

stone: 07/21/2014 09:30 CDT

Greatings from the Max Planck Institute, Holger is just a few offices down the corridor. He has the right to sit on the images for 6 months and not showing it to anybody. This was the regulations he assigned to and with he has the right to work on. The mission is pre-web2.0 but NASA and ESA grant those right to nearly all the PIs of the instruments. He is giving images out fast enough for the public, I think. The images which showed the binary comet are a big game-changer and worth a nice front cover image in Nature. There are two currencies in which space research, publications and appearance in the top media. This is the stuff you need to get money and other PI-ships to ensure the future of the institute yu work in. One point I wanted to make a lot of the material I liked to see from NASA is not published online. The GC and MS data from SAM is not available at once! The Kepler mission does nothing like it, and nobody is discussing it. The large telescopes do images every night and they are not put online every day. The Hubble Space Telescope is not giving out everything, so why are they different?

Gregory K: 07/21/2014 12:14 CDT

The solution is obvious. NASA should slow down image releases to avoid putting pressure on the ESA. But on a more serious note. There’s an economic argument here. Presumably the scientists put some economic value on exclusive access to these photos. Were they no longer given that benefit, they would want something of equal value to replace it, like a higher salary. So to me the question isn’t “Should the ESA release images to the public more frequently?” it’s “Should the ESA release images to the public more frequently if it means a higher mission cost and potentially less science output due to budget constraints?”

Laszlo Molnar: 07/21/2014 01:05 CDT

@stone: a correction, the proprietary period for Kepler was gradually shortened and reached zero by the end of the primary mission. K2 data will be public right away (though more effort will be required to process them). The planetary missions are better examples: MESSENGER and Dawn do not release raw/downgraded data either, only selected, processed images. Same goes for the Mars Orbiters. Also, you can argue that the ROI for the general public ARE the pretty, prepared images, not the raw data space enthusiasts wish to play with, whether or not do they do a better job at the end.

aspaceman: 07/21/2014 01:07 CDT

Hey JB.Vincent and stone, thanks for finding this and responding. Not always is there a both-sides story available. Your work is appreciated, and the public's let down of seeing information being withheld is not anything new. We are entitled people. I am sad to see a very wordy request for more, more, more on the planetary society blog-reel. I can see how it relates to public perception of space agencies and how our publicly financed information is withheld, but I do not see how it will help us improve our relation and perception of space agencies nor how it will make more of the information desired any more available. As a scientific community, let's stay focused. Our opinions are ours. If we can use our opinions to strengthen a mission, then put it there. Otherwise you're slowing us down.

stone: 07/21/2014 01:29 CDT

"Our opinions are ours. If we can use our opinions to strengthen a mission, then put it there." Some of the science interested community is attacking one of us with the greedy statement: "We paid for it we want to have it. We do not care for your career or your people who life from PR and the goodwill of politicians." We should make clear that there might be room for improvement with the release of images.It is not to hide the images, but to process them make a them presentable and life from the PR (to get money for further missions) and built a career from the publications.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

LightSail - Flight by Light

Support LightSail!

In 2016, The Planetary Society’s LightSail program will take the technology a step further.

I want to help!

Featured Images

Drill hole at Confidence Hills, Curiosity sol 759

Drilling at Confidence Hills, Curiosity sols 755-759
Curiosity at Pahrump Hills, sol 753
The Base of Mount Sharp, Curiosity sol 752
More Images

Featured Video

View Larger »

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!