Four mission assembly progress reports: ExoMars TGO, InSight, OSIRIS-REx, and BepiColombo
2015 has seen few deep-spacecraft launches, but 2016 is shaping up to be a banner year with three launches, followed quickly by a fourth in early 2017. You can see the list in Olaf Frohn's always-excellent "what's up in the solar system" diagram. ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and its passenger, the Schiaparelli landing demonstrator, is working toward a January launch: InSight will go in March; OSIRIS-REx in September; and BepiColombo's triple spacecraft in January. All told, there are eight or nine spacecraft launching with these four missions. (I wasn't sure whether to count OSIRIS-REx's sample return capsule as a distinct spacecraft, thus my uncertainty about eight or nine.)
What's Up in the Solar System diagram by Olaf Frohn (updated for May 2017)
A diagram, updated once a month, of active space missions traveling beyond Earth orbit. Contains links to past diagrams.
It's always cool to see spacecraft baby pictures -- photos of the machines undergoing assembly. They are among the most advanced technology that humans produce; and yet each one is hand-crafted and unique. This is small-batch artisan high technology. We've been treated to many such baby pictures in the last few weeks.
Schiaparelli, also known as the ExoMars Entry, descent and landing Demonstrator Module (EDM), suspended above the Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) on an overhead crane in the Cannes facility of Thales Alenia Space (France) on April 11 2015, in preparation for their attachment.
In this photo taken April 30, 2015, Lockheed Martin engineers and technicians test the deployment of the InSight lander’s solar arrays. This configuration is how the spacecraft will look on the surface of Mars.
In this February 2015 scene from a clean room at Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, specialists are building the heat shield to protect NASA's InSight spacecraft when it is speeding through the Martian atmosphere.
Next up is OSIRIS-REx. We've been watching that mission's development on this site through Dante Lauretta's guest blogs, but I don't want it to be left out of this photo roundup, so here's one of the images from his most recent post, which is as much about the people who build these spacecraft as it is about the spacecraft itself:
OSIRIS-REx SRC team
A dedicated team at Lockheed Martin continues to make great progress in building the Sample Return Capsule (SRC).
The flight model of the BepiColombo Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter (MMO), which arrived at ESA's European Space Research and Technology Centre, The Netherlands, in April 2015. The MMO has been lifted off of the base of its transport container and is ready to be mounted on its integration stand. The MMO integration adapter (on the yellow stand) can be seen in the background. The large disc on top of the spacecraft is the high-gain antenna, which will be used to transmit data back to Earth. The protoflight model of the Mercury Transfer Module (MTM) is visible on the right. MTM will provide solar-electric propulsion for the spacecraft stack during the journey to Mercury.
It's very exciting to see BepiColombo come together, and not just because we desperately need new spacecraft sent toward the inner solar system now that MESSENGER is no more. I'm thrilled to see the success of this partnership between JAXA and ESA. ESA has the success with deep-space missions that has been somewhat elusive to JAXA, while JAXA has unmatched creativity in spacecraft design. We've seen what a success interagency cooperation can be, with Cassini-Huygens; but such cooperation has been rocky recently, with NASA unceremoniously withdrawing from partnerships with ESA on ExoMars and the originally planned joint Jupiter mission. I have high hopes for the cooperation between ESA and JAXA on BepiColombo -- I hope that the mission will demonstrate that such cooperation multiplies the value of each agency's individual contribution to the mission.
A postscript: I had an interesting diversion yesterday, trying to understand what the words "protoflight model" meant -- ESA uses the phrase to name the Mercury Transfer Module. It's clearly a portmanteau of "prototype" and "flight", and it turns out that that's exactly what the word means. To ESA "protoflight" models can be both one-of-a-kind high-fidelity prototypes and also the actual flight article that will be launched into space. It's a word that's not used on NASA missions, as far as I understand things. NASA missions have "flight" hardware, which goes to space, and "engineering models," which remain on Earth. Most NASA engineering models that I have seen are essentially flight-qualified spacecraft, but the engineering models are the spacecraft that get put through the more severe environmental testing. To make things more confusing, ESA also uses the phrase "engineering model," but to ESA, an engineering model is not a flight article; it's a thing that you use on Earth for testing. Which is what NASA calls a "testbed." I thought space-related acronyms were confusing; but different usage of the same phrases within different space communities is even more confusing!