Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Casey Profile Picture Thumbnail

2014 NASA Budget Cuts $200 million from Planetary Science -- Again

Posted by Casey Dreier

10-04-2013 12:00 CDT

Topics: Planetary Society Political Advocacy, Space Policy, FY2014 NASA Budget

I share the sad news that the White House has doubled down on their previous effort to gut NASA's planetary science program. They request $1.218 billion for 2014, more than $200 million less than what Congress approved this year.

But it gets worse.

That number, $1.218 billion, includes two line items entirely new to Planetary Science that don't support any new or existing missions: direct funding for Plutonium-238 production and additional funding for asteroid detection in support of NASA's new Asteroid Retrieval Mission.

Now, we need both of these (Plutonium especially, one of the bright points of the budget), but the additional money is a budgeting trick: Plutonium funding was moved over from its old home in the Department of Energy's budget; the money for asteroid detection is new, but it doesn't support spacecraft mission development.

So the actual number for apples-to-apples comparison of the budget is $1.148 billion, almost the same as the Administration projected last year.

They did not listen to Congress. They did not listen the tens of thousands of emails, faxes, letters, or calls sent to them last year.

Congress is on our side, but once again we need to tell Congress that this is important.

 
See other posts from April 2013

 

Or read more blog entries about: Planetary Society Political Advocacy, Space Policy, FY2014 NASA Budget

Comments:

Bob Ware: 04/10/2013 10:43 CDT

I posted this in Bill & van Kanes blogs: Politicians are always short sighted therefore they always cut positive growth where they find it. In the U.S. gov't there are only two areas of positive growth... NASA and the military. Of the two only the military is a negative positive growth. NASA is a positive positive growth therefore it carries no budget validation and therefore must carry the full brunt of financial hardships, including budget cuts of unjustified reasons. Yeah, I'm mad - period.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

LightSail - Flight by Light

Support LightSail!

In 2016, The Planetary Society’s LightSail program will take the technology a step further.

I want to help!

Featured Images

Philae's landing site in 3D

Hayabusa-2 spacecraft
Curiosity in-situ science targets at Confidence Hills, sols 758-771
The Confidence Hills work area at the edge of Pahrump Hills outcrop, Curiosity sol 777
More Images

Featured Video

View Larger »

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!