Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Jason Davis headshot v.2

Meet NASA's Winning Asteroid Redirect Spacecraft, and the Asteroid It May Visit

Posted by Jason Davis

25-03-2015 17:52 CDT

Topics: mission status, future technology, asteroids, human spaceflight, radar imaging

NASA has decided to pluck a small boulder off a large asteroid instead of bagging an entire asteroid outright, the agency announced Wednesday. The selection of so-called Option B refines the look of the Asteroid Redirect Mission, a plan to capture part of a near-Earth asteroid and return it to lunar orbit, where it will be visited by astronauts in late 2025. 

The news ends months of speculation that included a no-decision announcement last December. During a conference call, NASA Associate Administrator Robert Lightfoot said the boulder return option was less risky in terms of target selection, and would allow the agency to try out more technologies applicable to future missions. 

"Option B—in my opinion, as the chair of the meeting—was the better option," said Lightfoot, describing his participation in a Mission Concept Review that eliminated Option A, in which a spacecraft would deploy a 10-meter bag to snare an entire asteroid. "We know larger asteroids have boulders on the surface. When I get there, I'll have an opportunity—with the sensor suite we’re going to put on here—to assess and check those boulders out. I’m going to have multiple targets to go after, is what it boils down to,” he said.

NASA

NASA Asteroid Redirect Mission concept
In this video, the Asteroid Redirect Mission spacecraft visits a large asteroid and retrieves a 3-meter boulder from the surface. The asteroid depicted in this video, Itokawa, is no longer the leading candidate for the mission.

The mission has a tentative launch date of December 2020. While NASA officials say they don't need to select a target asteroid until 2019, the current short list is Itokawa, Bennu and yet-unnamed 2008 EV5. Itokawa was visited by Japan’s Hayabusa spacecraft in 2005, and Bennu is the target of NASA's upcoming OSIRIS-REx sample return mission. 2008 EV5, said Lightfoot, is the current front-runner.

EV5 was discovered in 2008 by the Catalina Sky Survey, near Tucson, Ariz. The asteroid’s leading expert is Dr. Michael Busch, a research scientist at the Mountain View, Calif.-based SETI Institute. Busch authored a 2011 paper characterizing EV5 using planetary radar observations taken from Arecibo Observatory and NASA's Deep Space Network radar dish in Goldstone, Calif.

Busch said EV5 is an ideal candidate for the ARM spacecraft, which needs to visit an asteroid with pluckable 3-meter surface boulders. When Busch’s team zapped EV5 with planetary radar, they were able to detect boulders as small as 7.5 meters, as well as tiny cobblestones. This indicates there should also be in-between-sized boulders. "We can’t see the 3-meter rocks, but we know that they should be there," he said.

EV5 has a diameter of roughly 400 meters. It appears to have a ridge bisecting its surface, with a large chunk knocked out of one side. When asked how he felt about the prospect of a spacecraft visiting the asteroid that became the basis of his CalTech thesis, he said: "I’d love to know how accurate my shape models are."

Asteroid 2008 EV5

Busch et. al (2001)

Asteroid 2008 EV5
A shape model of asteroid 2008 EV5. The asteroid rotates around the z-axis, with +z in the direction of the angular momentum vector. Yellow-shaded regions were seen only at incidence angles greater than 45 degrees, or not seen at all.

The orbit of EV5 is roughly that of Earth’s, differing by just one-fifteenth of a year. Its last flyby was 2008, so it won’t be back until 2023 or 2024. If the ARM spacecraft departed for EV5 in late 2020, it could spend anywhere from 215 to 400 days in orbit—including time to grab a boulder. As EV5 approached Earth, the ARM spacecraft would slip back into the Earth-moon system, eventually ending up in lunar distant retrograde orbit, or DRO. 

The crewed portion of ARM wouldn’t occur until 2025. An Orion spacecraft would be sent to lunar DRO via the Space Launch System. Orion would dock with the capture spacecraft, allowing a two-person EVA crew to inspect the boulder and collect samples. The mission would last about 25 days.

NASA's first SLS-Orion flight, Exploration Mission 1, is scheduled for no later than November 2018. EM-2, the first crewed flight, is expected in 2021. In the past, NASA has said SLS should begin flying once per year after EM-2. But with the crewed asteroid mission not slated until 2025, it isn't clear what else might fill the SLS manifest.

Asteroid Redirect Mission spacecraft

NASA

Asteroid Redirect Mission spacecraft
NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission aims to grab a small boulder from a large asteroid and return it to lunar orbit, where it will be visited by a crew of astronauts in 2025.

The ARM spacecraft's cost cap, Lightfoot said, remains $1.25 billion—not including the launch vehicle. Funding for ARM is currently scattered between multiple NASA programs.

"I think there will be some (funding) increase that is specific to the mission," he said. "We will take advantage of solar electric propulsion, which is estimated roughly at $300 million, which is already in the runout for space technologies. There's some capture technique mecahnisms that were already in parts of the human exploration budget."

Will ARM be officially stamped into next year's budget request? "I hope so. That's my plan," he said. 

While the main goal of ARM is demonstrating technologies useful for deep space human exploration missions, there are also expected to be science benefits. In addition to a sample return, the target asteroid will be mapped, and the captured boulder will be characterized by instruments aboard the ARM spacecraft. "There’s some cool science that we’ll get out of it," said Busch.

Alessondra Springmann, a graduate researcher for the OSIRIS-REx mission, said ARM also demonstrates the importance of planetary radar. In particular, Arecibo Observatory, where she once worked, is unique in its ability to team up with other dishes like Goldstone to characterize asteroids. And unlike Goldstone, Arecibo doesn't have to compete for scheduling time with NASA's Deep Space Network. However, the observatory has recently struggled to stay funded.

"Radar bridges the gap between optical observatories and space missions," Springmann said. "There’s no other way to see boulders on the surface of an asteroid."

 
See other posts from March 2015

 

Or read more blog entries about: mission status, future technology, asteroids, human spaceflight, radar imaging

Comments:

Arbitrary: 03/25/2015 11:08 CDT

Wouldn't it be better to take a small sample and land it on Earth, like all other sample return missions do? The extra tons of sample mass, of the same piece of rock, don't give much more extra science. Especially not when considering that the tens of billions of dollars it would cost to put a boulder in Lunar orbit and visit it with astronauts, could be spent on making several normal sample return missions from several different asteroids and comets. I think this ARM thinky has serious conceptual flaws and will be canceled. The money should, and I hope will, instead be spent on developing a lunar lander so that the SLS+Orion has somewhere to go.

Jody: 03/26/2015 01:03 CDT

No mention of the gravity tractor test? Looking at the video that seems to be a major part of the mission, using the 3 metre rock to increase the mass of the spacecraft.

Gene: 03/26/2015 01:15 CDT

Can someone briefly explain the advantage of a lunar orbit for safekeeping as opposed to a terrestrial one? I would naively expect the manned mission might be simpler/cheaper for the latter.

Enzo: 03/26/2015 06:16 CDT

@Arbitrary, @Gene, You are correct, if the objective of this mission were asteroid exploration, then it would be a lot easier/cheaper to do it roboticly and/or in LEO. However, this is a human space mission. Its purpose is to test and develop techniques and equipment to put humans in space. Science, if any, is a welcome side effect, certainly not the objective. You have to see it more like an engineering project where a compromise has to be found that it is not too difficult/expensive (like a Mars landing or a real deep space mission to an asteroid) and not too easy/done already (like a LEO operation).

Dr Morbius : 03/26/2015 09:36 CDT

I am afraid I cannot support such a mission. It seems like a stunt designed to funnel billions to the manned spaceflight Directorate with almost no scientific return. The goals could be better satisfied with a robotic mission for a fraction of the cost and even that is probably not needed since a lot of these asteroids are represented on Earth in the form of meteorites. I suspect that there will be huge cost overruns and emergencies and other needless tangents that will drain money away from the science mission Directorate.

Jason Davis: 03/28/2015 10:51 CDT

Enzo is correct. This is primarily an engineering mission. Whether or not it is valuable, or the best use of resources, or truly a stepping stone to Mars is certainly up for debate. But those questions are best answered in their full historical context, which goes something like this. (I say "something like this" to warn that this is not a publication-ready, fact-checked response; rather, it is an "as I currently understand it" response.) When NASA and the Obama administration first announced their intentions to visit an asteroid rather than returning to the moon, the plan was to visit an asteroid in its native orbit. However, NASA soon realized that this would be difficult -- arguably, just as difficult as a mission to Mars. Therefore, visiting an asteroid was deemed not to be a great choice for a Mars "stepping stone" mission. But the directive to visit an asteroid remained. And the need to test out solar electric propulsion and deep space rendezvous and EVA techniques remained. So the idea to bring an asteroid back to lunar orbit, ARM, came into existence. If the rock is brought back to lunar orbit, then it is much more of a challenge to visit it as opposed to visiting it in low-Earth orbit. So again, whether or not this is the best way to advance humans to Mars exploration can, and should, be debated. But I caution that this is not just as simple as playing armchair rocket scientist. These discussions must take place in their political and historical context, which is often uncomfortable and less straightforward, but that is the reality of living with a taxpayer-funded space program. Jason

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Essential Advocacy

Our Advocacy Program 
provides each Society member 
a voice in the process.



Funding is critical. The more 
we have, the more effective 
we can be, translating into more 
missions, more science, 
and more exploration.

Donate

Featured Images

Qualification Motor 2
Long March 7 inaugural liftoff
Long March 7 inaugural liftoff
Blue WISE Pleiades
More Images

Featured Video

The Planetary Post - James Webb Space Telescope

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!