Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Jason Davis headshot v.3

Report: NASA May Be Hard-Pressed to Launch SLS by November 2018

Posted by Jason Davis

20-03-2015 12:11 CDT

Topics: SLS, Orion, human spaceflight

Last week in Utah, NASA celebrated the successful test-firing of a Space Launch System solid rocket booster. But the booster had hardly finished smoldering when the agency's oversight office threw a wet blanket on the big rocket's November 2018 launch deadline.

In a report released Wednesday, NASA’s Office of Inspector General warned that Ground Systems Development and Operations, or GSDO, may be hard-pressed to have Kennedy Space Center's launch facilities ready on time. Ground systems are a critical piece of the SLS-Orion infrastructure. All three elements are tightly integrated, with ground systems requiring significant input from the rocket and capsule designs. 

"GSDO cannot finalize and complete its requirements without substantial input for the other two programs," said Jim Morrison, the assistant inspector general for audits. "And NASA is still finalizing the requirements for those programs."

Launch America

Jason Davis / The Planetary Society

Launch America
Work continues to upgrade Kennedy Space Center's iconic Vehicle Assembly Building.

Historically, said the OIG, NASA has taken a more centralized approach to the management of its in-house launch programs, synchronizing development activities through a single contractor. This is not the case for SLS, Orion and GSDO—each program is managed independently, with an emphasis placed on cross-program coordination. The OIG believes this approach is inefficient and could lead to scheduling delays.

"Since June 2012, NASA has identified 462 interdependencies between the GSDO, SLS, and Orion Programs," the report said. "To date, NASA has resolved 295 items (63.8 percent) with 167 remaining."

In a statement to The Planetary Society, NASA said the current approach is actually similar to the Apollo program: 

"...the way we are managing the Exploration Systems Development portfolio comprising Ground Systems Development and Operations, Orion, and Space Launch System Programs is very similar to the approach used for Apollo. ESD represents the central management and integration function for the portfolio and, although we refer to it as a cross-program systems integration, it performs the same integration function that was performed among the Apollo-era programs in the 1960s. The primary difference is that, unlike in the Apollo era, ESD does not have a large integration contractor to do the work. Under the ESD approach, we leverage the normal cadre of the systems integration workforce that resides in each of the three programs in addition to a Headquarters-led workforce specifically focused on systems engineering and integration. We believe this is a more effective approach because each program has an investment and ownership of the systems integration effort; we are all in this together.

Program progress, as highlighted by the recent EFT-1 test flight and QM-1 motor test, confirms that this approach is working well through the initial design and development phase of our programs. We continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach and make adjustments when necessary."

The OIG report lists several hardware interdependencies that could delay ground systems development, ultimately pushing back a November 2018 launch. For example, work on the Orion Service Module Umbilical, or OSMU, could be delayed while GSDO waits on connector plates that attach cables and hoses to Orion.

There were also issues raised with integration and testing schedules. The Mobile Launcher must be moved into the Vehicle Assembly Building for testing prior to the delivery of SLS and Orion. When it comes time to stack the rocket and capsule for the first flight, there may be a "learning curve," said the report, where engineers work through unforseen glitches.

Another potential problem is the completion of software used to prepare, monitor and launch SLS. The software package, called Spaceport Command and Control System, or SCCS, must be tested and validated before SLS and Orion make their way to pad 39B. SCCS controls everything from pumps and motors at the launch pad to displays inside the Kennedy Space Center firing room.

"Historically, software development efforts have been a source of significant cost and schedule overruns, and the complexity and highly interdependent nature of the GSDO effort combine to make software development one of the greatest risks to on-time and on-budget performance of the Program," the report said.

Watching from the Mobile Launcher

Jason Davis / The Planetary Society

Watching from the Mobile Launcher
Workers at the Kennedy Space Center line the top sections of the Mobile Launcher to watch Orion lift off for Exploration Flight Test 1. The moveable tower will eventually be used to launch the Space Launch System.

As of December 2014, here are the completion rates for various ground systems hardware: 

Launch Pad 39B: 25 percent complete.

Mobile Launcher: 43 percent complete. The exhaust opening has been widened from 45 square meters for Ares to 190 square meters for SLS, with steel reinforcement beams added to support the rocket’s weight.

Crawler-Transporter 2: 36 percent complete.

Vehicle Assembly Building: 14 percent complete. That sounds low, but the OIG said the VAB is generally on schedule to meet a September 2017 readiness date. 

"They have made steady progress on the major equipment and facilities modernization initiatives," Morrison said, "including upgrading the Crawler-Transporter, which NASA used for many years to move the shuttle to the launch pad, and adapting the Mobile Launcher to accommodate the larger engines to be used on the SLS."

Orion, SLS and GSDO are each scheduled to complete a Critical Design Review, or CDR, this year. The report narrowed the CDR timelines to July for SLS, October for Orion and December for GSDO. Initially, a CDR for ground systems was scheduled for March, but the OIG recommended NASA delay the review until after SLS and Orion. The move should give GSDO more confidence that designs for SLS and Orion are stable.

William Gerstenmaier, the head of NASA’s Human Exploration and Operations Directorate, concurred with that recommendation, but warned that moving the ground systems CDR to December was no guarantee that SLS and Orion would finish first.

"There remains a risk," he wrote, "that one of the flight program CDRs could slip its planned date and follow the ground program CDR."

SLS pierces the clouds


SLS pierces the clouds
The 70-metric-ton version of NASA's Space Launch System pierces the clouds in this artist's rendering.

Despite its concerns, the OIG is not writing off a launch date of November 2018 just yet.

"It is too early to say whether these substantial coordination challenges will result in cost or schedule issues for the Exploration Mission 1 launch," the report said. "Moreover, new issues are likely to be uncovered during integration – the point at which most projects encounter technical problems that impact cost and schedule. Given these challenges, coordination efforts among the GSDO, SLS, and Orion Programs are essential to successfully meeting NASA’s human exploration goals."

See other posts from March 2015


Or read more blog entries about: SLS, Orion, human spaceflight


Tony Mach: 03/20/2015 04:20 CDT

At the risk of sounding defeatist to some, but this gives SpaceX all the more a chance to build a heavy lift vehicle at a reasonable price, and spare us from this pork-barrel to nowhere.

Dougforspaceexplr: 03/20/2015 06:55 CDT

I agree that it is not the best idea to spread the responsibilities for developing the Space Launch System over a couple agencies and I hope this doesn't delay its first launch beyond late 2018. I still support the Space Launch System and although there is significant cost associated with it, it should be remembered that each of the last Space Shuttle flights were about 600 million each with around 6 flights a year for a cost of at least 3 billion a year so I hope NASA will spend at least this much for the Space Launch System and the crewed part of supporting private space flight to the Space Station to replace the Space Shuttle. Although some people say the SLS is a mission to nowhere and it could certainly get going faster if it had more funding, I think it would be a much better immediate destination for the SLS to go to the Moon than to a small asteroid as there is much more of scientific interest on the Moon and more strategic interest to compete with possible near-term missions from other powers such as China and Russia. It would be good to still have Mars as the eventual destination or if a direct path to Mars was desired that a faster timeline would be chosen such as for the 2020s that people like Mars Society director Robert Zubrin says is possible instead of the 2030s. In a 2014 article by Todd May Space Launch System and NASA's Path to Mars it is shown that on the 130 ton version of SLS NASA has designed for a destination lander to Mars called the Design Reference Architecture 5 (DRA5) or there would be room I'm sure for a Moon destination lander for a manned SLS trip to the Moon. I just hope that either President Obama will have a change of heart soon or future presidents will be more open to focusing on the Moon as an immediate destination of SLS instead of an asteroid than President Obama has so far. I also support SpaceX and hope they can make more progress for manned trips to the Moon or Mars by completing the crewed Dragon and the Falcon 9 Heavy.

Anonymous: 12/02/2015 12:46 CST

Both SLS and Orion are doomed. The SLS will likely only fly once before the whole program is mothballed along with Orion. Why? Budget constraints, a new administration and last not but not least SpaceX will be able to do everything they are meant to do and much more at a fraction of the cost.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Planetary Defense

An asteroid or comet headed for Earth is the only large-scale natural disaster we can prevent. Working together to fund our Shoemaker NEO Grants for astronomers, we can help save the world.


Featured Images

Jupiter from Juno at Perijove #4
Jupiter in approximate true color during Juno perijove 4
More Images

Featured Video

Class 9: Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!