Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

JunoCam raw data from the Juno approach movie

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

09-08-2016 15:03 CDT

Topics: pretty pictures, amateur image processing, Juno, Jupiter

As it approached Jupiter from June 12 to 29, JunoCam captured an animation of the major moons orbiting the planet, covering 17 days -- one complete Callisto orbital period. The mission released a processed version of the animation on the day of orbit insertion, but took a few weeks to release the raw image data. With a little help from Gerald Eichstädt (who produced thumbnails) I've now assembled one of my usual thumbnail previews of the entire data set. JunoCam should have restarted imaging after Jupiter orbit insertion on July 11, and should be acquiring another movie now, the "Marble Movie," on approach to its August 27 perijove. I've seen only one image formally released so far from that sequence, but TODAY the mission posted nearly 900 Megabytes of raw data from the Marble Movie on the JunoCam processing website -- stay tuned for more from that!

Although I'm happy that amateurs get to work on the JunoCam data, I don't recommend this data set for beginners. If you've never tried playing with spacecraft image data before, begin with Curiosity or Cassini or Opportunity. But even if you don't intend to actually work with the data, you might enjoy some reading on what makes this data set particularly challenging.

A quick reminder on JunoCam's peculiarities:

  • The camera is mounted on the side of a spinning spacecraft.
  • It uses spacecraft spin to build up long image swaths. Raw images can be as many as 1648 pixels wide by 31488 pixels tall.
  • Its field of view is very wide-angle: across-swath field of view is 58 degrees, and it can take 360-degree image swaths over one complete spacecraft spin.
  • It is a "pushframe" imager, so each image is made of numerous skinny framelets that need to be puzzle-pieced together to make a coherent picture. The framelets overlap, so it's not as simple as just tiling them next to each other.
  • A raw RGB color image has alternating red, green, and blue framelets, as many as 82 of each in a single long 360-degree image swath.

What does all this mean? Consider this image. If you click on the link, you'll get to an extremely long, skinny noodle that looks almost entirely black. It represents a 360-degree view around the spacecraft. They took the entire 360 degrees because during the approach, there wasn't a good way to inform JunoCam where Juno was in its spin phase, so to be certain of imaging Jupiter, they had to capture the entire swath around the spacecraft. Scroll to the bottom of the photo and you'll find what looks like (and is) multiple images of Jupiter. Here's a crop:

Raw JunoCam approach image of Jupiter


Raw JunoCam approach image of Jupiter
Cropped from frame 1570, taken June 29, 2016 at 16:25 UTC from a distance of 5.4 million kilometers.

There are three and a half photos of Jupiter, each of them on a different part of the detector -- red, green, or blue. In the red and blue channels, Jupiter fell entirely on one framelet. In the green channel, the image is split across two framelets (although one of the two green images is like 99% contained within one framelet). I can color in the image to show you which framelets fell on which part of the detector.

Raw JunoCam approach image of Jupiter (colorized)

NASA / JPL / SwRI / MSSS / Emily Lakdawalla

Raw JunoCam approach image of Jupiter (colorized)
Cropped from frame 1570, taken June 29, 2016 at 16:25 UTC from a distance of 5.4 million kilometers. The image has been colorized according to the colors of the filters for each image framelet.

Align the channels and adjust their relative brightness a bit, and voilá -- a teeny tiny image of Jupiter.

Jupiter on Juno approach

NASA / JPL / SwRI / MSSS / Emily Lakdawalla

Jupiter on Juno approach
Three framelets from a single JunoCam observation of Jupiter have been overlaid into a color photo.

Enlarge it a bit, and this is my best effort at processing the photo. But what's that little black dot on Jupiter? As you can see in the teeny (full original size) image immediately above this paragraph, it's only a pixel in size, which usually suggests a blemish on the photo. But remember that it's in all three channels, red, green, and blue; no blemish would be in the same exact position on three distinct photos. If you look at a view of Jupiter as seen from the Sun at the time of that photo, you'll see what it is: the shadow of Io being cast on the disk. Neat!

JunoCam approach image of Jupiter with Io shadow

NASA / JPL / SwRI / MSSS / Emily Lakdawalla

JunoCam approach image of Jupiter with Io shadow
This is one of the last photos of Jupiter taken by Juno on approach to orbit insertion, on June 29, 2016. A small black dot on the photo is the shadow cast by Jupiter's innermost moon Io.

Here are a couple of other amateur efforts at processing the image. Björn Jónsson applied his best effort to one of the last images in the sequence, which was returned to Earth with lossless compression so shows sharp features on Jupiter:

Final Juno approach image of Jupiter

NASA / JPL-Caltech / SwRI / MSSS / Björn Jónsson

Final Juno approach image of Jupiter
This is the last photo Juno took on approach to Jupiter, from a distance of 5.3 million kilometers. It has been color-corrected from raw data using Jupiter's visible-light spectrum as a guide.

And Gerald Eichstädt has been developing an automated image processing pipeline that has spat out these two versions of the animation. This is just about the best that can be done without tedious hand-editing of the individual frames. In the top one, you can really only see Jupiter; in the bottom one, he's stretched the contrast strongly in order to reveal the moons, but that also emphasizes compression artifacts. (The data were compressed onboard the spacecraft before transmission to Earth, so the compression artifacts are present in the original, raw data.) The versions below have suffered additionally from YouTube compression; you can get AVI versions of the animation here (unstretched) and here (stretched).



See other posts from August 2016


Or read more blog entries about: pretty pictures, amateur image processing, Juno, Jupiter


galileo: 08/09/2016 07:22 CDT

Emily, really enjoyed this article. What procedure did you use for aligning the channels from the framelets to make the colored image of Jupiter. Thanks

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Essential Advocacy

Our Advocacy Program provides each Society member a voice in the process.

Funding is critical. The more we have, the more effective we can be, translating into more missions, more science, and more exploration.


Featured Images

Comparison of Schiaparelli and Opportunity landing locations
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera image of Curiosity landing site
Schiaparelli landing site, after landing attempt
Ewen Whitaker
More Images

Featured Video

The Planetary Post - Star Trek 50th Anniversary

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!