Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

Juno's first taste of science from Jupiter

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

30-06-2016 18:23 CDT

Topics: pretty pictures, magnetospheres, mission status, Juno, Jupiter

Jupiter is growing in Juno's forward view as the spacecraft approaches for its orbit insertion July 5 (July 4 in the Americas). The mission has released two views of Jupiter and moons taken about 7 days apart. This happens to be Ganymede's orbital period, so the three inner moons -- Ganymede, Europa, and Io -- are in nearly the same positions in the two photos. In the time separating them Ganymede went around Jupiter once, Europa twice, and Io four times. Hopefully, on Monday, NASA will release a movie with more frames connecting these two endpoints, and more! We're supposed to be seeing raw images from that movie released at the same time, too -- I'm trying to find out how and where we'll be able to get those. These photos are unusual because Jupiter appears at half-phase, and the stripes are not perfectly horizontal, because of Juno's polar trajectory. (The moons don't appear to be half-phase because they are not resolved -- they are just dots as far as the camera can tell.)

Juno sights Jupiter

NASA / JPL-Caltech / SwRI / MSSS

Juno sights Jupiter
A JunoCam image from June 21, 2016 from a distance of 10.9 million kilometers shows Jupiter and its four largest moons. From left to right, they are Ganymede, Callisto, Io, and Europa.
Near the end of approach

NASA / JPL-Caltech / SwRI / MSSS

Near the end of approach
A JunoCam image from June 28, 2016 from a distance of 6.2 million kilometers shows Jupiter and three of its largest moons. From left to right, they are Ganymede, Io, and Europa.

All the science instruments have been returning data on approach. At a press briefing this morning, the team showed some very early data from one of them, the plasma waves instrument, which has been measuring the solar wind during cruise and is now directly measuring Jupiter's magnetosphere. They crossed the bow shock on Friday, June 24 (where the solar wind slows to subsonic speeds as it's diverted around Jupiter's magnetosphere), and entered the magnetosphere itself on Saturday, June 25. Here the plasma waves data has been turned into sound, to help you sense the differences between solar and Jupiter environments.


At a press briefing that the mission held today, I asked about data from other instruments. The answer was that all the instruments have been gathering data and the science team is very happy, but it's going to take a while to understand what the rest of the instruments' data are telling us; only the JunoCam and Waves data were amenable to such a rapid turnaround for presentation. I think that is going to be the story of this mission. Many of the investigations will need to assemble quite a bit of data before they can even begin to interpret it.

Not all of the mission science is being done by Juno itself. Other spacecraft, like Hubble, are making observations in support of the Juno mission. Today, Hubble released a gorgeous video of Jupiter's aurora, something that Juno will be able to investigate once it's in orbit. Unlike Hubble, Juno will be able to see an entire pole at once (instead of just the half that's facing Earth).

Now that science is beginning, a lot of people are asking questions about how this mission will be different from Galileo. To be sure, Juno and Galileo share a lot of similar instruments -- plasma waves, magnetometer, energetic particles, radio science. All of these instruments are designed to investigate Jupiter's magnetic field, energetic particle environment, and internal structure. What makes them different?

It's mostly about location. "Fields and particles" instruments do in-situ investigations, meaning that they measure properties of Jupiter at the location of the spacecraft. This is in contrast to remote sensing investigations, which measure properties of Jupiter from a distance.

If you are an in-situ investigation examining a 3-dimensional structure like Jupiter's magnetosphere, you need to take your spacecraft to as many different locations within the 3-D structure as you can. Because it focused on Jupiter's moons, Galileo was constrained to an orbit close to the plane of the moons' orbits, confining it to only a 2-D slice of the magnetosphere around the equator. Galileo also avoided Jupiter's donut-shaped radiation belts, mostly staying relatively far away from Jupiter outside Europa's orbit, so hardly probed the magnetosphere close to the planet.

In contrast to Galileo, Juno has a polar orbit that will fly to a wide variety of different latitudes and distances from Jupiter. And its orbit takes it through the donut hole of the radiation belts, very close to the planet.

Here are two views comparing the Galileo and Juno orbital trajectories at Jupiter, created using a really terrific visualization tool built by Science News. You can see that while Galileo samples a lot of longitudes, all its orbits are in one plane and mostly pretty far from Jupiter.

Comparison of Galileo and Juno orbital trajectories
Comparison of Galileo and Juno orbital trajectories
Made using a visualization tool produced by Christopher Crockett for Science News

Together, these two characteristics of Juno's orbit -- its high inclination, and the close approach of its periapsis -- will make its measurements of Jupiter's magnetosphere much more complete than anything Galileo could achieve. On the other hand, Galileo sampled a wider variety of longitudes at great distance from Jupiter. The two data sets complement each other. In the long term, I'm sure that the science team will be incorporating Galileo data into their work on interpreting Juno results.

Here's another Science News visualization -- it has to zoom way in at the end to show you how much closer Juno gets to Jupiter than any other mission ever has.

Science News

Jupiter's visitors
Every spacecraft that has visited Jupiter has traced a different path past or around the giant planet. Here's 43 years of Jupiter drive-bys, compressed to a couple of minutes. Learn more here. (Story by Chris Crockett; animation by Sean Kelley; production by Helen Thompson.)

It's terrific that the science is beginning, even before Juno gets into orbit. Tomorrow I'll put a post together with suggestions on how to follow orbit insertion events. Stay tuned.

Save

Save

Save

 
See other posts from June 2016

 

Or read more blog entries about: pretty pictures, magnetospheres, mission status, Juno, Jupiter

Comments:

Messy: 07/01/2016 03:43 CDT

Good news!!!! New Hoizons is going to MU69 and will make a bunch of distant observations of dozens of KBOs, The bad news is that Dawn won't be going to 145 Adeona..or 2 Pallas, or 3 Juno....or....So I hope they send it to a 12-mile high orbit as a consolation prize. http://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-receives-mission-extension-to-kuiper-belt-dawn-to-remain-at-ceres

KenD : 07/02/2016 10:01 CDT

Although I can think of a couple of reasons for it, I thought I'd ask... Since Juno is approaching Jupiter from behind (orbitally speaking), why do the images show the sunlit side of the planet on the right side?

Joe: 07/02/2016 01:07 CDT

@KenD: I had exactly the same initial reaction as you: North is up, the planets (and Juno) orbit the Sun anticlockwise, Juno is coming from behind, so Jupiter should be lit from the left!? I think the explanation lies in the somewhat counter-intuitive orbital mechanics: Juno first overtakes Jupiter on the inner lane, and then waits for Jupiter to catch up with it. So, currently, Juno is actually ahead of Jupiter, and seeing Jupiter in the rear view mirror.

Joe: 07/02/2016 01:37 CDT

Hmm, I should not have mentioned a mirror... Let's say Juno is looking back over its right shoulder.

KenD: 07/02/2016 02:04 CDT

Thanks, Joe. That makes sense if they're using Jupiter's gravity to assist in reducing the spacecraft's velocity. That wasn't one of the explanations I was thinking of. Since Jupiter is usually used to gain velocity it didn't occur to me. Thanks again.

Joe: 07/03/2016 05:50 CDT

This trajectory video illustrates it nicely https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYp5p2oL51g

KenD: 07/03/2016 08:08 CDT

Aren't modern computer graphics wonderful? Just imagine if we were having this exchange in '81, when Voyager 2 was getting its gravity assist at Saturn. (First of all, it would have been extremely unlikely, as we would have needed either CSNET or ARPANET accounts (VERY limited clientele)) Anyway, we would still have been limited to text and the conversation would have been much longer, with much hand waving and orbital mechanics involved. I do NOT miss the old days.

Skque: 07/05/2016 04:38 CDT

Thanks for sharing it. Would love to read more on this.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Essential Advocacy

Our Advocacy Program provides each Society member a voice in the process.

Funding is critical. The more we have, the more effective we can be, translating into more missions, more science, and more exploration.

Donate

Featured Images

NGC 4100
The Flaming Star Nebula (IC 405)
LDN 604 and GGD 30
Schiaparelli backshell and parachute landing location from HiRISE in color
More Images

Featured Video

The Planetary Post - Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!