Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

A new angle on Churyumov-Gerasimenko brings circular features into focus

Posted By Emily Lakdawalla

04-08-2014 10:23 CDT

Topics: Rosetta and Philae, pretty pictures, comets, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

It's just two days now until Rosetta arrives in its initial 100-kilometer "orbit" of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, and the latest view from Rosetta's NavCam is fascinating. It doesn't look like a rubber duck anymore; several people have told me that they see the Sphinx in it now.

NavCam view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on August 3, 2014

Look at all those circular features! Let's magnify the image by a factor of 3 to appreciate them better:

NavCam view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on August 3, 2014

ESA / Rosetta / NavCam / Emily Lakdawalla

NavCam view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on August 3, 2014
Rosetta took this photo of the comet from a distance of only 300 kilometers away. The image has a resolution of 25.6 meters per pixel. It has been cleaned of artifacts. The long axis of the comet measures 5 kilometers.

The circular features remind me strongly of the ones seen on comet Tempel 1 by Deep Impact and Stardust:

Stardust's closeup views of Tempel 1

NASA / JPL / Cornell / animation by Emily Lakdawalla

Stardust's closeup views of Tempel 1
Here, the 10 images taken by Stardust nearest its closest approach to Tempel 1 have been resized and rotated to match each other, taking out some of the distracting effects of spacecraft motion, making it easier to follow morphological features as Stardust passes by the comet.

Are they impact craters? They might be. But they might also be some uniquely cometary feature. We don't really know. Rosetta is the first mission to orbit a comet rather than just fly by one. So it really represents our first opportunity to study such features from every angle to try to understand how they form and evolve. Comets can change fast, as we saw with Tempel 1, so Rosetta may even get to see surface features change over time.

Surface changes on Tempel 1

NASA / JPL / Cornell

Surface changes on Tempel 1
There were changes in the surface of comet Tempel 1 between the time it was first observed by Deep Impact on July 4, 2005 (top right), and by Stardust on February 15, 2011 (bottom right). Between the two visits, the comet made one trip around the sun. The image at top left is a wider shot from Deep Impact. The smooth terrain is at a higher elevation than the more textured surface around it. Scientists think that cliffs, illustrated with yellow lines to the right, are being eroded back to the left in this view. The cliffs appear to have eroded as much as 20 to 30 meters in some places, since Deep Impact took the initial image. The box shows depressions that have merged together over time, also from erosion. This erosion is caused by volatile substances evaporating away from the comet.

We can see the surface features in the latest NavCam image more clearly partially because Rosetta is closer to the comet than before, but also because it has shifted its position with respect to the comet and the Sun so that shadows now outline its features. I liked this higher-angle view so much that I decided it was time to update my compet comparison montage with it:

Scale comparison of comets visited by spacecraft as of 2014

Image credits: Halley: Russian Academy of Sciences / Ted Stryk. Borrelly: NASA / JPL / Ted Stryk. Tempel 1 and Hartley 2: NASA / JPL / UMD. Churyumov-Gerasimenko: ESA / Rosetta / NavCam / Emily Lakdawalla. Wild 2: NASA / JPL. Montage by Emily Lakdawalla.

Scale comparison of comets visited by spacecraft as of 2014
As of 2014, six comets have been visited by spacecraft; the most recent addition is Rosetta's 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

One thing I noticed while updating this view is that, if I've done my math right, the comet's long axis is a bit longer than previously estimated, about 5 kilometers. That's not unusual. A new estimate for the dimensions of the comet will be one of the first scientific results from this mission!

There is going to be a media event for the arrival at the comet on August 6, so stay tuned for news from that.

 
See other posts from August 2014

 

Read more blog entries about: Rosetta and Philae, pretty pictures, comets, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Comments:

Bob Ware: 08/04/2014 02:02 CDT

I'm wondering if these circular features are formed in the same way as Martian South Pole venting through the icecap. On numerous images I have seen/marked southern pole vents that appear to be the results of jet venting tied into sublimation of the CO2 ice cap leaving material deposits as blotches or fans (wind shaped) on the surface. Other remaining features are nicknamed 'spiders' because of the (vague) resemblance to spiders. The introductory image to me looks like a Melcotian (sp?) from the Star Trek Episode "Spectre of the Gun".

Bob Ware: 08/04/2014 02:03 CDT

This Melcotian is waving hello.

morganism: 08/04/2014 04:22 CDT

It is an interesting possibility that the short UV is actually causing the erosion/evaporation. check out this paper on graphene decomposition in water. It can create PAHs and hydroxyls. This could be an unsuspected vehicle for a lot of weird chem features that are showing up in spectra http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i31/Graphene-Surprises-Decomposing.html Graphene can "self repair" its structure by adding free carbon. It can slide over the surface, and refill holes.

Bob Ware: 08/04/2014 09:46 CDT

Considering the compositions of Earth and Mars (where we are today) this makes you wonder if 2 zones of these materials in solar orbit are where we each formed, plus bombardment, leading to today's current compositional/planetary states. In the photo-disassociated state to the bonded (correct chem. term?) level of CO2 & H2O, would today's ratios show this for Earth and Mars? That is Earth has primarily more water and Mars more carbon dioxide by planet scale to each other? (simplistic overview) Would planet size be a factor?

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!