Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

More excitement in the outermost solar system: 2013 FY27, a new dwarf planet

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

02-04-2014 10:49 CDT

Topics: trans-neptunian objects, explaining science, dwarf planets beyond Neptune

On the heels of last week's reports of a second Sedna and a ringed Centaur comes a third cool outer solar system discovery: A new, likely large member of the Kuiper belt. With an absolute magnitude of about 3.0, the new object currently known as 2013 FY27 is the tenth brightest object beyond Neptune (after Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Haumea, Charon, Sedna, 2007 OR10, Orcus, and Quaoar, in that order). We don't know much about it, and translating brightness into size is pretty inexact, but it's a good bet that it's in the neighborhood of 900 kilometers in diameter, plenty big enough to be round: a new dwarf planet.*

FY27 was discovered by Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo, in the same survey that yielded VP113, the second Sedna. FY27 is currently about 80 astronomical units from the Sun, similar to VP113's current distance, and therefore one of the most distant currently observable objects in the solar system. Why was there so much fanfare for VP113, but not for FY27?

Orbit of 2013 FY27

NASA / JPL Small-body Database Browser

Orbit of 2013 FY27
Graphic made using the JPL Small-body Database Browser orbit diagram applet. Some of 2013 FY27's orbital elements are: semimajor axis 59 AU; eccentricity 0.40; inclination 33.1° perihelion 36 AU; orbital period 450 years.

Remember, what made VP113 unusual wasn't its current distance from the Sun; it was the shape of VP113's orbit and the fact that it never gets closer than about 80 AU from the Sun. A lot of people are getting confused about this, reporting VP113 as the most distant object in the solar system. It isn't; Eris is farther away, and so is Sedna, and so are both Voyagers, and so are known long-period comets (though we can't currently observe those). Both VP113 and FY27 are currently about 80 AU from the Sun, but unlike VP113, the new FY27 is near its aphelion, almost as far away as it ever gets. Over time, FY27's orbit will bring it much closer, to Neptune's neighborhood. As such, while it's an unusually distant object among the things we currently know about, its orbit doesn't stretch the boundaries of our solar system the way VP113 did. Here's a view comparing VP113, FY27, the planets, Pluto, and Eris. FY27's orbit is not like Sedna's; it's more Eris-like.

Orbits of 2013 FY27, 2012 VP113, and Eris, compared

NASA / JPL Small-body Database Browser / Emily Lakdawalla

Orbits of 2013 FY27, 2012 VP113, and Eris, compared
Graphic made using the JPL Small-body Database Browser orbit diagram applet and overlaying several screen shots in Photoshop. Like Eris, 2013 FY27 has an inclined orbit that travels quite far from the Sun but returns to near the neighborhood of Neptune.

What makes FY27 special, to me, is its brightness, and implied size. It is almost certainly a round world, and it's a member of a size range of Kuiper belt objects that have really diverse surfaces, implying that each of these worlds has a unique story to tell, variations on themes of ices and organic gunks and transient atmospheres. (Read an article I wrote about Salacia for more about that.) I contacted Scott Sheppard to see if he could tell me anything more about it that wasn't in the MPEC, but there isn't a lot of information on FY27's nature yet. They don't know its color. Still: it's a new round world; it's not every day we add another one of those to our solar system.

Why didn't anyone detect it before? Scott told me that it's because it's fainter than any all-sky survey for trans-Neptunian objects; currently, all-sky TNO surveys have only reached to about 21st magnitude, and FY27 was 22nd magnitude. (He pointed me to this 2011 paper discussing a southern-sky survey that reached to magnitude 21.6.) It's so faint, despite its size, because it's near its aphelion, like Eris and 2007 OR10. That's no coincidence; Kepler's laws of planetary motion tell us that objects in noticeably eccentric orbits spend a lot more time very far from the Sun than they spend very close to the Sun. So all these scattered objects on eccentric orbits are hiding far away, where it's hard to see them; it's only a few rare ones like Sedna and VP113 that just happen to be close enough to us right now for our surveys to detect them.

"That is why we think there are many more large objects out in the inner Oort cloud that Sedna and 2012 VP113 occupy," Scott explained in an email. "Most of these inner Oort cloud objects are going to be near aphelion just like Eris, OR10 and FY27 are in the scattered disk. As the inner Oort cloud aphelion for most objects will be some 500 to 1500 AU out, even Earth-sized objects would not be detected in surveys."

Which means that there are a lot more of these yet to discover. Cool.

...And right after I posted this, Michele Bannister pointed out to me that Sheppard and Trujillo have also found another new object, 2013 FZ27. It's not as bright as FY27 but, at magnitude 4.1, it's highly likely to be a dwarf planet, and in the top 30 brightest trans-Neptunians. Our picture of the solar system changes every day!

 *Note: 2013 FY27 has just been automatically added to Mike Brown's list of potential dwarf planets. It's listed with an estimated diameter of only 761 kilometers, but that assumes an albedo of 15%, and if you compare to all the other bodies with similar absolute magnitudes on the list, you'll see that they're darker than that. Assuming an albedo of 9%, like Varda, gives you a diameter closer to 950, and if it's as dark as Salacia, it could be as big as 1500 kilometers. So I think 900 is a conservative estimate here.

 
See other posts from April 2014

 

Or read more blog entries about: trans-neptunian objects, explaining science, dwarf planets beyond Neptune

Comments:

Stephen Uitti: 04/02/2014 11:32 CDT

I've heard you need to characterize the orbit (and maybe other stuff) before the IAU will let you name the object. For 2012 VP113, the estimated orbit takes 4200 years, so 10% is 420 years, give or take. Astronomers used a time machine for Eris. They found a prediscovery image from the 1950s. It would be quicker to land a beacon on it, assuming that'd be enough. HST images can have 10 times the resolving power of a 5 m ground based scope. But if it could be done with 1% of an arc, that's still 42 years. It could be awhile.

Laurel Kornfeld: 04/02/2014 05:56 CDT

Even if 2013FY27 is 761 km in diameter, it is clearly beyond the threshold for hydrostatic equilibrium and therefore yet another small planet. It's looking like Dr. Alan Stern has the most accurate understanding of our solar system as one that could have up to 900 planets! As technology improves and as more of these small planets come to perihelion, it is inevitable that more will be discovered.

Kevin Heider: 04/02/2014 06:33 CDT

I would like to know why Mike Brown is using a dimmer value for absolute magnitude (H) than the MPC. VP113: MPC=4.0, Brown=4.4. FY27: MPC=3.0, Brown=3.3.

DrKrypton: 04/03/2014 08:52 CDT

Put sattelites around them or on them.

Lionel: 04/08/2014 07:43 CDT

A really delightful fortnight of discoveries in our solar system! Biden, rings around Chariklo, FY27 and not least the underground sea inside Enceladus Also, @Mike Wrathell put things very well - very much agreed with all points he made about the IAU's 2006 decision. Not just is it messed up that a dwarf star is a star and a dwarf galaxy is a galaxy but a dwarf planet not a planet, but also as the definition sits a rogue planet is also not a planet, and a Planet X of any size that we find beyond Neptune will not be a planet either, even if it's a super earth or gas giant. The naming system really doesn't serve Anyway congratulations to all involved in the science work that's led to these latest discoveries!

Chang: 04/10/2014 07:48 CDT

Should that be the TENTH "brightest object beyond Neptune" rather than the ninth? I think you omit Charon from your list.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

JOIN THE
PLANETARY SOCIETY

Our Curiosity Knows No Bounds!

Become a member of The Planetary Society and together we will create the future of space exploration.

Join Us

Featured Images

Orion's forward bay cover jettison

Astronaut’s-Eye View of NASA’s Orion Spacecraft Re-entry
A shift in shadows for Yutu, December 19(?), 2013
Yutu heads south, December 22, 2013
More Images

Featured Video

View Larger »

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!