Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now Join Now!

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

   Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

What's the significance of this unremarkable spot on the Moon?

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

29-11-2010 8:38 CST

Topics:

This was a fun image released by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera science team. Take a look at it and see if you can figure out what the significance of the red arrow is. I'll give you a hint: it doesn't have anything to do with any past mission to the Moon; it's not a landing or impact site for any spacecraft, past or future.

Guess why the red arrow is there!

NASA / GSFC / ASU

Guess why the red arrow is there!
Stumped? Let's back out of the image a bit. Here is some wide-angle context. The white arrow points to the area seen in the zoomed-in image above.
Wide-angle context

NASA / GSFC / ASU

Wide-angle context
Engel'gradt crater (named after Russian astronomer Vasilij Pavlovich Engel'gradt, 1828-1915) is 44 kilometers in diameter. North is up. Mosaic width is 100 kilometers.

Do you give up yet?

The red arrow points to the highest-elevation point on the entire surface of the Moon, which measured 10,786 meters above the mean lunar elevation. That's kind of crazy, isn't it? It doesn't look anything like the highest point on Earth -- or, for that matter, on Venus or Mars. Earth, Venus, and Mars' high points are all in mountains. On Earth and Venus the mountains were built by tectonics, forces arising from within the Earth that cause compression of the crust. When you squeeze something from the sides, it squirts upward; that's what's built the Himalayas on Earth (and Mount Everest at 8,848 meters above sea level), and Maxwell Montes on Venus. Mars appears to have lacked those kind of mountain-building compressional tectonics, but it compensates with the biggest volcanoes in the solar system; its Olympus Mons rises 24 kilometers above its surrounding plains (and 21 kilometers above Mars' mean elevation).

This lunar high point doesn't look like either type of mountain, tectonic or volcanic. It's just kind of a nameless spot in the middle of a fairly typical-looking highland landscape with lots of craters. This high point wasn't built by tectonic or volcanic processes; it's just a spot where the ejecta from one of the solar system's greatest impact craters, the south polar-Aitken basin, happened to pile to its deepest level, and was not subsequently whittled down by other, smaller craters. It's possible that a couple of later impact craters (like Engel'gardt) piled more stuff on top of the spot.

Given that it's so flat and unassuming, how did the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter team even find it? The general area of the highest elevation spot on the Moon was first identified with Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) data, then the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera was commanded to capture a stereo pair of images of that area from which a digital elevation model could be generated, and they found the high point within that model.

 
See other posts from November 2010

 

Or read more blog entries about:

Comments:

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

LightSail - Flight by Light

Support LightSail!

In 2016, The Planetary Society’s LightSail program will take the technology a step further.

I want to help!

Featured Images

Aillik, Curiosity sol 322

Shaler outcrop, Curiosity sol 316
Wernecke, Curiosity sol 169
Altar Mountain
More Images

Featured Video

View Larger »

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!