Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Casey Profile Picture Thumbnail

What's Going on With Planetary Science Research?

Budget cuts mixed with a new way to fund science could disproportionately impact the next generation of planetary scientists

Posted by Casey Dreier

04-12-2013 13:44 CST

Topics: FY2014 NASA Budget, Explaining Policy, Space Policy

Something major is happening in the world of planetary science. It will directly affect nearly every scientist working today, but ultimately it will impact every supporter of planetary exploration through its long-term influence on the scientific community.

There are two things going on here:

  1. NASA's Planetary Science Division is going to reshuffle its grant-making process, consolidating 17 different grant programs into 8.
  2. As part of this restructuring, it pushes the deadline the biggest new grant program (the awkwardly-named "Solar System Workings") into 2015, effectively skipping a year of science grants due to budget cuts by the White House and sequestration.

So why is this a big deal for non-scientists? Well, the restructure itself isn't necessarily bad on its merits (though many scientists are irked by the secretive process which created it). But #2 – the skipping a year of grants – will make it harder for a number of scientists to pay their bills, maybe leading to fewer scientists. Fewer scientists will do less science, lead to a loss of institutional knowledge, and squander years of training and investment by the nation.

Most scientists don't work directly for NASA. They are not federal employees – think of them more as contractors. They tend to be associated with either universities or research institutions which only support a portion of their salary. Nearly every scientist has to find ways to make up their remaining salary while also paying graduate students and buying equipment for their research. Planetary scientists depend on NASA's grant program to support all of these activities, no other part of government supports this. This is generally given the compelling name "Research and Analysis" or "R&A" for short.

If you know scientists (or follow some on Twitter) you'll notice that a few times a year they'll start to get pretty distracted. They'll start looking haggard, maybe they'll have big bags under their eyes, or develop stress lines, or just disappear from view for a while. When asked, they'll say something vague about working on a "proposal." This is grant-writing time. Scientists will propose to study a particular question (or set of questions) about the solar system to a particular grant-program at NASA. The competition is fierce; the rate at which proposals are selected for funding is around 10% – about the same chance of getting accepted into a competitive college.

Scientists go through this process multiple times each year, depending on how much funding they need. This tends to be a bigger deal for scientists early in their careers and "soft money" scientists, so-called because of their lack of any hard (i.e. guaranteed) funding. While most grants last around three years, very few pay for a scientist's entire salary. They need several simultaneous grants to support themselves and their research.

A decrease in these grants will disproportionately impact the next generation of planetary scientists. Early-career scientists are in a very vulnerable position. Most don't have faculty jobs. Those that do haven't yet been awarded tenure. They are just starting their research careers, and many have salaries paid for by grants won by more established scientists. The NASA representatives behind this reorganization stated that scientists can petition their grant sources for more money to help them cover this "gap year." But if you're a young scientist, you may not have any grant sources yet. You're on your own.

Mark Sykes, the Director of the Planetary Science Institute (which depends on a healthy R&A budget for its operations), made a rough estimate that the grant delay could free up nearly $60 million in 2015. This, I noticed, is about how much it costs to operate the Cassini orbiter at Saturn, a mission which seems to be on the brink of early termination. Is this the cost of continuing Cassini for another year?

No one at NASA is discussing the next budget, details about FY2015 are embargoed until next Spring. We just don't know exactly how bad (or, optimistically, good) the budget will be for planetary exploration next year. All signs currently suggest that cuts will continue. As NASA Planetary Science R&A Program Officer Jonathan Rall said during a recent town hall with the scientific community, "this is going to be a harsh wake up and a harsh reality."

For all of the details, you can download the slides detailing the exact changes to the grant programs for NASA's Planetary Science Division [pdf] or see the overview page for FAQs, presentations, and reports.

Of course, if NASA's Planetary Science program was funded our recommended level of $1.5 billion per year (its historical average) scientists wouldn't be facing this problem. You can write your elected officials right now to help.

See other posts from December 2013


Or read more blog entries about: FY2014 NASA Budget, Explaining Policy, Space Policy


Emily Cotman: 12/04/2013 07:46 CST

This is frightening... What can we, members, do to help? Are there specific talking points that seem to be hitting home with representatives?

reader reader: 12/04/2013 09:01 CST

You might find some talking points from the article here Cut entire young generation of scientists, while making sure a big defense contractor rakes in the profit on a noncompeted, cost-plus contract. Sadly, the outcome is predictable

Casey Dreier: 12/05/2013 12:11 CST

Emily, first make sure you've signed our petition most recent petition at: You'll get an email explaining how to call your elected officials. We've been recommended a higher number for all of Planetary Science at NASA – $1.5 billion – which would allow robus research and the start of a new Europa mission. As for specific talking points, here are a few: * Cuts in scientific research for planetary science are the result of White House policy, not Congress. This is the inevitable outcome of the Administration's decision to reduce US presence in the solar system. * These cuts will impose disproportionate damage to scientists just starting their careers, damaging long-term U.S. competitiveness. * Maintaining the historical average of $1.5B for the planetary exploration program would solve this program along with many others.

Dan Cook: 12/08/2013 02:09 CST

Unfortunately, I have seen this happen in the public schools also. We even have a "rainy day" fund in Texas to offset economic downtimes that our legislature refused to use to help fund the schools. Many good teachers lost their jobs when it was completely unnecessary. I received a response from one of my Senators to the TPS letter. It clearly stated that cuts to NASA and other parts of the budget are part of the sequester and that nothing is as important as repealing Obamacare and shrinking entitlement spending. We are stuck with both a device originally designed as a thought experiment to push people towards compromise and a political agenda purposefully crafted to make every agency suffer as much as possible so that the person at the tip gets absolute blame. These individuals are playing political games with our country's future that have very little to do with financial stewardship.

Emily Cotman: 12/11/2013 02:04 CST

Thank you, Casey. I just called my House representative. I'll give my Senator a ring on tomorrow's lunch break!

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Planetary Defense

An asteroid or comet headed for Earth is the only large-scale natural disaster we can prevent. Working together to fund our Shoemaker NEO Grants for astronomers, we can help save the world.


Featured Images

LightSail 2 and Prox-1
Bill Nye at LightSail 2 pre-ship review
LightSail 2 pre-ship review team photo
Swirling maelstrom
More Images

Featured Video

Class 9: Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!