Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Casey Profile Picture Thumbnail

Tiptoeing Towards the Edge

Sequestration Looks to Be Inevitable, What Happens to Planetary Science?

Posted by Casey Dreier

27-12-2012 16:09 CST

Topics: Space Policy, Planetary Society Political Advocacy

Don't let my profile picture fool you. I'm not smiling today.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced earlier that no fiscal cliff deal seemed likely before December 31st, and that sequestion – the across-the-board cuts to all federal programs – may be inevitable. NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD), which manages the planetary exploration program, stands to lose $417 million in funding over the next nine months. If the pain is spread equally among major divisions within the SMD, planetary science looks to lose around $100 million in addition to the deep cuts already proposed for 2013.

This would obviously be very bad for the program.

A few weeks ago, the NASA Administrator, Charles Bolden, released a statement discussing the immediate effects of sequestration on NASA as a whole, which can be mitigated in the short term. Money quote:

I do not expect our day-to-day operations to change dramatically on or immediately after January 2, should sequestration occur. This means that we will not be executing any immediate personnel actions, such as furloughs, on that date. Should we have to operate under reduced funding levels for an extended period of time, we may have to consider furloughs or other actions in the future. But let me assure you that we will carefully examine other options to reduce costs within the agency before taking such action, taking into consideration our obligation to execute our core mission.

This seems to be the standard tactic among government agencies. They assume that sequestration will be reversed within the next few weeks, and if not, they are vague on the details of what will actually happen. They're slow-walking implementation of cuts because they're betting on a resolution.

Note that delaying any cuts now will make the eventual cutbacks much deeper in order to hit the overall savings targets by the end of the fiscal year on Sep 30th, 2013.

We here at the Planetary Society will continue to follow this story very closely over the next few weeks.


More details on Sequestration and Planetary Science

The other deep cuts facing the Planetary Exploration program (FAQ)

The Planetary Society's Campaign to Save Our Science

See other posts from December 2012


Or read more blog entries about: Space Policy, Planetary Society Political Advocacy


Tom Wray: 12/28/2012 12:21 CST

This plan(at your site) helps relieve sequestration woes... When funds are tight, the only option left is to reduce the amount of funds needed to accomplish the task! All projects are possible at greatly reduced cost.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search


Election 2016

Space rarely makes a strong showing in national elections, despite the major state of transition NASA finds itself in today.

Help us catalog and source statements made by candidates referring to civil space issues.

Learn More

Featured Images

Mercury and Venus from MESSENGER
HiRISE view of Curiosity, sol 1207 (December 29, 2015)
Tiny grains of Martian sand
Fine and coarse fractions of Namib dune sand
More Images

Featured Video

Intro Astronomy 2016. Class 2: How We Explore Space

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!