Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

LPSC 2015: Philae at comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

18-03-2015 16:05 CDT

Topics: Rosetta and Philae, comets, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, conference report

Well, it was a whirlwind couple of days in Houston at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Here are a few highlights of the meeting. I've learned that the only way to get LPSC blog posts off of my computer and into the wild is to publish them in small chunks, so I'll begin at the beginning with the three talks I attended on the Philae comet lander. Links at the beginnings of these paragraphs take you to two-page conference abstracts, in PDF format.

Stefano Mottola talked about analysis of images from ROLIS, the descent camera, which include the area of Philae's first touchdown. It was an area, he said, whose landscape was dominated by mantling deposits derived from airfall of comet particles. He showed images on which he mapped parallel sets of ridges, talking about them as "aeolian" features, and even pointed out that the large boulder present in the ROLIS descent images has a moat and a windtail, just as large boulders do in deserts on Earth. The "moat" was clear in an image from his presentation, made from a digital elevation model computed from a pair of ROLIS images shot at slightly different angles. Now, an airless body with virtually no gravity cannot have wind creating sand dunes and windtails as Earth deserts do. Mottola suggested that the particles on the surface of the comet might get pushed into motion to create dune-like features by splashing effects -- falling particles kicking surface particles off the surface, setting off waves of motion. Paul Rincon wrote more about these windtails at BBC News.

ROLIS view of Churyumov-Gerasimenko from 40 meters altitude

ESA / Rosetta / Philae / ROLIS / DLR

ROLIS view of Churyumov-Gerasimenko from 40 meters altitude
The large block at upper right is about 5 meters across; the Philae landing gear intrudes into the upper right corner.

Ian Wright walked the audience through the Ptolemy mass spectrometer results that Philae took immediately after landing. They're a challenge to interpret because they were taken in a geometry that they had not practiced for -- that is, while floating through the sky above the comet. In fact, Wright said, the measurement was made several minutes after landing, at about the same time that OSIRIS snapped the image of Philae floating away from its landing site:

OSIRIS sees Philae multiple times during landing

ESA / Rosetta / DLR / MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / SSO / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA

OSIRIS sees Philae multiple times during landing
The sharp-eyed OSIRIS camera on the Rosetta orbiter snapped numerous images of Philae as it descended toward its touchdown on the comet on November 12 at 15:34 UTC. Images documented the spacecraft rotating, and also saw evidence of the lander's touchdown on the comet surface. One final image, captured 9 minutes after the landing, sees the spacecraft bright against the shadowed surface, heading to the east on its first bounce.

Despite the unplanned-for flight, Ptolemy did ingest something from the space around the comet, and there is a mass spectrum to interpret. Wright showed that the mass spectrum is somewhat rhythmic in its form, with a decaying series of peaks from lower to higher masses. That, he said, is the hallmark of the presence of some kind of polymer, which breaks into longer or shorter chains of subunits, producing this kind of rhythmic mass spectrum. He said that the Giotto mass spectrometer, PICCA, saw something similar at Halley, detecting polyoxymethylene, which is a polymer made of sets of carbon atoms linked to two hydrogens and one oxygen. "Once you've accepted that," he said, "there are other interesting things," such as the lack of any detection of nitrogen at a mass of 14, and similarly, no sulfur at mass 34. There is a peak at mass 28, likely representing carbon monoxide. Apart from that, he said, "Everyone keep your fingers crossed for Philae waking up, because clearly we've got a working instrument that could make some good measurements at the surface of a comet." Wright punctuated his talk with stills from this adorable cartoon, recently released by ESA:

The final Philae talk was by Jean-Pierre Bibring, on the images taken by the panoramic ÇIVA camera after the final landing. His talk mostly presented information I've blogged about before, but there were a few tidbits that show developing science. He said that the albedo of the surface observed by ÇIVA ranged from 3 to 10 percent. In general, he said that the features observed by ÇIVA were mostly consistent with processes that have acted to change the appearance of the comet's surface since it formed. For instance, cracks likely result from thermal fatigue (the repeated heating and cooling of the comet surface). Angular fragments of comet material likely result from the fragmentation of the comet's surface following this thermal cracking. Bright grains appear here and there on the dark surface, likely deposited there by comet activity. Then he stepped back a little and considered what ÇIVA and OSIRIS images together tell us about the comet. He pointed out that we don't seem to see large blocks of many hundreds of meters; rather, the comet seems to be made of relatively small pebbles, on centimeter to meter scales. Even the large boulder in the ROLIS image, above, is visibly composed of smaller pieces somehow glued together. "67P could be entirely made of pebbles," he said, and suggested that the observations by Rosetta and Philae support the solar system formation modeling work of Karl Jansson and Anders Johansen on "pebble-pile planetesimals".

Philae's first ÇIVA panorama from the surface of Churyumov-Gerasimenko

ESA / Rosetta / Philae / CIVA

Philae's first ÇIVA panorama from the surface of Churyumov-Gerasimenko
This panorama is composed of two ÇIVA images, representing just a part of the full panorama. One of the lander legs is visible at left; at lower right is one of the CONSERT antennae.

It is still very early to draw major conclusions from the Philae mission. After all, we still hope that the lander will wake up to do more science; Rosetta is now listening for the lander regularly. I talked with Philae lander manager Stefan Ulamec at the LPSC poster session yesterday, and (as he has said ever since landing day) he still does not expect to hear anything from the lander until at least May.

I talked with other comet scientists about the Philae talks afterwards, and they were dubious about Mottola's aeolian interpretation of the landforms on the comet. The thing is, you have tiny masses experiencing tiny forces under nearly zero gravity; there's no lab work you can do on Earth that can help you understand the physics that's at play here. But the ROLIS images will give us a starting point, at least, telling us what it is that we need to understand. If I had to generalize from what I saw at the Philae session, it's to say that physics at very small scales is very important in comets -- in how they are put together, and how they behave. So it's a good thing we sent a lander down to the surface to tell us what it looks like, and we have a lot left to learn from Philae.

I did not attend any Rosetta talks at the conference, so I'm grateful to the other LPSC microbloggers who attended and tweeted. Here is a sampling of Rosetta results from later in the session:

 
See other posts from March 2015

 

Or read more blog entries about: Rosetta and Philae, comets, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, conference report

Comments:

morganism: 03/19/2015 05:12 CDT

80 % pourus, no large voids from Consert data, and now pebble pile? How does that work? I thought there were impact destruction effects at the micrometer, centimeter, meter, and kilometer scales, where all postulated structures were disrupted? Now with the paper on chrondules being formed from splash-melt, it seems there must be a different formation model that is more diverse than the snow line, or the gas line out in the clouds

Torbjörn Larsson: 03/23/2015 06:45 CDT

Pebble-pile planetesimals to the rescue!? [And, while a layman, I too am confused by the tension in observed and assumed constraints. Though I note in the pebble-pile paper that the collapse can leave the pile porous:] "If the planetesimal is built up by cm-sized pebbles it will be porous and have both low density and low internal strength. ... If, on the other hand, the planetesimal is a mixture of pebbles and dust it can be packed very compactly and have a high density. In the case of low-mass clouds they collapse without any fragmentation and therefore become pebble piles with low density." On this: "The thing is, you have tiny masses experiencing tiny forces under nearly zero gravity; there's no lab work you can do on Earth that can help you understand the physics that's at play here." Perhaps a low speed centrifuge on the ISS could be a good investment for comet research?

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Essential Advocacy

Our Advocacy Program 
provides each Society member 
a voice in the process.



Funding is critical. The more 
we have, the more effective 
we can be, translating into more 
missions, more science, 
and more exploration.

Donate

Featured Images

Near the end of approach
Juno sights Jupiter
Cleaning up the QM-2 deluge
QM-2 booster smokes the hillside
More Images

Featured Video

The Planetary Post - James Webb Space Telescope

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!