ICE/ISEE-3 update: Amateurs detect its signal while professionals study contacting it
Posted by Emily Lakdawalla
20-03-2014 10:12 CDT
Since the last time I reported on ICE/ISEE-3, there have been several developments. As a reminder, ISEE-3 was launched in 1978 to study Earth's magnetosphere and repurposed in 1983 to study two comets. Renamed the International Cometary Explorer (ICE), it has been in a heliocentric orbit since then, traveling just slightly faster than Earth. It's finally catching up to us from behind, and will return to Earth in August. It's still functioning, broadcasting a carrier signal that the Deep Space Network successfully detected in 2008. If we command the spacecraft to fire its engines at the appropriate moment -- something that must happen within the next few months -- we can recapture it into a halo orbit at the Sun-Earth L1 Lagrangian point. The spacecraft could provide useful science data and also a valuable training platform for spacecraft operations and international cooperation. But the hardware necessary to transmit the properly modulated signal to command the spacecraft was scrapped more than a decade ago, and as of my last update, a Goddard Spaceflight Center team had determined it was too expensive to attempt to rebuild that hardware in time.
I have rarely had a post generate more comments and email than that one. In particular, amateur radio operators around the world contacted me to ask if I had information on the spacecraft's position. Leonard Garcia suggested that they use the NASA Satellite Situation Center Website, in particular its Orbit Viewer, to get location information. A short while later, the spacecraft was also added into JPL's HORIZONS solar system data and ephemeris computation service, making it easy for anyone to determine the spacecraft's trajectory.
The first to pick up the signal were the AMSAT-DL team, a group of amateurs who use a 20-meter antenna located in Germany to receive signals from deep-space probes. They successfully detected ICE/ISEE-3's carrier signal on March 1 and 2.
And professionals have been rising to the challenge, too. The Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Maryland also has a 20-meter antenna, theoretically capable of commanding the spacecraft; but like the Deep Space Network, APL no longer has the hardware necessary to generate the correct form of radio signal to command the spacecraft. However, I heard from APL's Michael Ryschkewitsch yesterday that they believe they might be able to generate the right waveforms thanks to recent developments in the technology of software-defined radio. Here's the Wikipedia definition of software-defined radio:
Software-defined radio (SDR) is a radio communication system where components that have been typically implemented in hardware (e.g. mixers, filters, amplifiers, modulators/demodulators, detectors, etc.) are instead implemented by means of software on a personal computer or embedded system. While the concept of SDR is not new, the rapidly evolving capabilities of digital electronics render practical many processes which used to be only theoretically possible.
Challenges remain, however. If they are to command the spacecraft to fire its engines to target it at the Sun-Earth L1 point again, they need to do it by late May or early June. But before they can perform that maneuver, they first have to command the spacecraft to return telemetry -- data about its systems and instruments that will tell us about its health. They need to understand its health -- are the instruments still working? More importantly, is the propulsion system still working? How well is it working -- what do they need to command the spacecraft to do, in order to achieve the right amount and direction of velocity change? There isn't much time. Ryschkewitsch told me:
We have also learned that the spacecraft's radio is about a thousand times less sensitive than the more modern systems we work with today. Because the trajectory correction maneuver to put ICE/ISEE-3 into the Earth-Sun L1 orbit has to happen well before the spacecraft's closest approach to Earth and when it's still very far away, we are not optimistic that we can get a strong enough signal to the spacecraft to execute that maneuver in time. Our licenses and our location in a highly populated area mean we have limits on our transmission-power levels, so we also don't have the very high-power transmitters that can be used elsewhere. We haven't given up and will continue to work with the Goddard team to figure out exactly what we can do and when we might be able to get commands sent to ICE/ISEE-3, as well as support discussions with other organizations that might have even larger, higher-powered antennas and transmitters and might be able to use our software-defined radio scheme with their systems.
I wish them luck!
Finally, I need to correct an error in my earlier reporting on ICE/ISEE-3. Back in 2008, Bob Farquhar told me a story that "the fellow who was supposed to have instructed ICE to turn off its radio transmitters during the last communications session maybe had not done so." But I now know that this story is false, as NASA's Jim Green explained to me this week. Jim said that since the original ISEE-3 was an Earth-orbiting mission with a radio system designed to receive transmissions from quite close by, it was a major challenge for it to receive commands from Earth as it drifted farther and farther away. He said that during the comet encounters they were using the world's biggest dish -- Arecibo -- to receive the faint signals from the spacecraft, and Arecibo had no transmission capability at the wavelengths at which ICE could hear them, so there was no thought of commanding it to do anything, much less to shut down.
An earlier version of this article stated Arecibo had no transmission capability. In fact, Arecibo can transmit at 2380 MHz; but ICE receives at 2042 and 2091 MHz. Thanks to Michael Busch for the correction.