At present, Deep Impact is imaging the comet once every five minutes with its medium- and high-resolution imagers. You might not recall that Deep Impact's highest-resolution camera suffers from a blurring problem (a fact that was very creatively taken advantage of for the spacecraft's reuse to hunt for transiting exoplanets), so the medium-resolution imager (MRI) is the one that is expected to produce the main publicity photos of Hartley 2, at least during the event. It will not resolve the comet's nucleus until an hour before closest approach on November 4, at which point the body, which is thought to be about 1.2 kilometers in diameter (and therefore one of the smaller bodies that's been visited by a spacecraft), should appear a modest 170 pixels across. The high-resolution imager might yield more details later, but only after time-consuming processing to cope with the blur. Between now and then, Deep Impact will examine Hartley 2's coma and watch it for outbursts and other changes as the comet passes through its perihelion, which happens on Wednesday.
The team is releasing an image roughly once a week right now, with the latest one being from October 1. Things have not changed much since their first image release, except that they are now subframing the images rather tightly around the comet, to only 256 pixels, in order to make room for more frequent images. (That means that the images are at their maximum possible resolution, but the spacecraft is only recording the center 25% of the pixels on its detector, which reduces its data volume by a factor of 16.) I haven't updated my approach animation recently because the animation doesn't really provide sensible information, since each image is stretched using different contrast and brightness settings before release.
NASA / JPL / UMD
Deep Impact's first photo of comet Hartley 2
Deep Impact captured this photo of comet Hartley 2 at the beginning of its flyby campaign on September 5, 2010, from a distance of 60 million kilometers.
As I've done in this space before, I should explain the acronyms used to name this mission: the original mission is "Deep Impact," but two extended missions were proposed, "Deep Impact Extended Investigation" or DIXI, and "Extrasolar Planet Observation and Characterization" or EPOCh. When both extended missions were funded, the combined extended mission was given the acronym "EPOXI," which as far as I know doesn't actually stand for anything, it's just a merger of the two acronyms and a pun on the word "epoxy," meaning the two were glued into one mission. I find this to be a bit much of a groaner, and I don't particularly like changing the name of a ship in midcourse, so the mission will probably always be "Deep Impact" to me. I realize that this may be seen as inconsistent with my policy of attempting to refer to the next Mars rover as "Curiosity" whenever I can, rather than Mars Science Laboratory or MSL, but in that case I'm still trying to pick the one name I plan to stick with in my reporting on a mission. Also, I hate acronyms.
We know you love reading about space exploration, but did you know you can make it happen?
Consider a gift to our Space Policy and Advocacy program to fuel more missions, more science, and more exploration.