Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now Join Now!

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

   Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

I didn't watch the Shuttle land -- but I sure noticed when it did!

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

09-08-2005 10:14 CDT

Topics:

I was sound asleep at home early this morning when the house shook with a double BANG. When you're in California and your house shakes you snap awake in a hurry because it could be the beginning of a big earthquake. But it wasn't. My husband went downstairs to look around outside but we couldn't figure out what had hit our house -- we weren't awake enough to think, yet, I guess. It was only when we had gotten up for good that we realized that it had been the sonic boom of the Shuttle, returning to Earth at Edwards Air Force Base. Lou Friedman reported to us in an email that he and his wife stepped outside their house and actually saw it fly in. "Neat," he remarked.

Wouldn't it be cool if the Shuttle missions were as commonplace as they had been imagined originally? Shuttles were supposed to be launching and landing routinely, a dozen, 30, even 48 times a year. We Angelenos would have felt ourselves a real part of the space age. We probably would be whining and moaning about being woken up routinely in the early hours of the moning by the sonic booms of the returning Shuttles. The complaint would have been a badge of honor. It's too bad it didn't turn out that way.

It's a relief that the landing happened safely. With the astronauts on the ground NASA gets to go back to trying to solve the foam problem again. What's been most disheartening about this whole episode is the pronouncements of various people in the media that NASA is "moribund" or "in the doldrums" or whatever. The manned space program has a serious vision problem right now, to be sure. But the robotic program is accomplishing incredible things. There are those who try to make a fight out of this contrast, but I think that arguments between people who favor manned exploration and people who say it's too expensive and we can accomplish everything in space with robots are like dog fanciers arguing with cat fanciers. It's a pointless argument without any possible resolution. We need both manned and robotic exploration. And if manned exploration is going to get anywhere, it will need robots -- for reconnaissance, first of all, and then for development and maintenance of the infrastructure humans need to survive, and then to assist human exploration.

 
See other posts from August 2005

 

Or read more blog entries about:

Comments:

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

JOIN THE
PLANETARY SOCIETY

Our Curiosity Knows No Bounds!

Become a member of The Planetary Society and together we will create the future of space exploration.

Join Us

Featured Images

The Pale Blue Dot of Earth

Scale comparison of comets visited by spacecraft as of 2014
OSIRIS view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on July 29, 2014
Instruments selected for the Mars 2020 rover
More Images

Fly to an Asteroid!

Travel to Bennu on the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft!

Send your name

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!