LPSC, Day 2: Morning sessions on our Moon and Saturn's moons
Posted By Emily Lakdawalla
2009/03/24 03:17 CDT
This morning at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference would have presented a challenge to me. On the one hand, there's the Moon, with a whole session devoted to Chandrayaan-1 and Chang'e 1 (actually, upon reading the abstracts, it was mostly Chandrayaan-1). But it was scheduled back-to-back with a session on the icy satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. I'll confess I probably would have made an effort to attend the lunar sessions, because you just don't get many results out of the Asian missions, but would eventually have crept away to the outer planets moons sessions.
For the most part, the abstracts from the lunar session contain descriptive information about each science instrument and about the commissioning phase of the mission, before science data was available, so there's not a lot of new stuff to report on. There was one abstract, reporting on the first results from the Moon Mineralogy Mapper, that did dare to put in writing some analysis: "A major new result is that the existence and distribution of massive amounts of anorthosite as a continuous stratigraphic crustal layer is now irrefutable." Anorthosite is the igneous rock that makes up the bright highlands areas of the Moon, in contrast to the much darker, basaltic igneous rocks that makes up the lunar maria. This statement was based upon mineralogical and stratigraphic analysis of the Orientale basin, one of the youngest big impact features on the Moon and one of the few that hasn't been entirely filled with basalts. The Moon Mineralogy Mapper team's conclusion basically states that underneath all those lunar basalts is more anorthosite.
By contrast, the abstracts from the icy satellites sessions had a lot more in-depth analysis of the geophysics underlying the surface features and shapes of icy moons. But after reading the abstracts it seems like an awful lot of the analysis is still producing more questions about the icy moons of Saturn and Jupiter than they are answers.For example, two different presenters talked about how the bizarre equatorial ridge on Iapetus may have formed. James Roberts and Francis Nimmo explored the possibility that the ridge formed as a result of the stresses that happened when Iapetus "despun." To explain, originally, all the moons of Saturn would have been spinning at some relatively fast rate, but stresses due to the tides raised on the moons decreased their spin rates over time until they became tidally locked with Saturn, a state in which they complete one rotation for every orbit and keep the same face pointed at Saturn at all times. This condition is also called "synchronous rotation." A faster-spinning moon will have an equatorial bulge that is larger than a slower-spinning moon. Iapetus, being relatively big (so it has relatively large gravity) and relatively distant from Saturn (so it orbits slowly, and consequently had a lot of slowing to do in order to get into synchronous rotation) would have experienced relatively large stresses due to despinning; that much isn't in doubt. But it's quite hard to get those stresses to make a very narrow ridge just at Iapetus' equator. Roberts wrote, "While our models produce elevated topography at the equator, we note there remain significant differences between our models and the observed ridge on Iapetus. In particular, the actual ridge is much taller and narrower that the one shown" as a result of his modeling.
The next presentation, by Jay Melosh and Francis Nimmo, looked at the narrow, steep shape of the ridge and asked: what structure that we've studied on Earth does it most resemble? They decided that Iapetus' ridge most resembles a dike, a volcanic structure that forms when a fissure opens in a stiff crust and is filled by intrusive magma. The abstract goes through a possible scenario that could create the right kind of stresses to make a dike form along the equator: it involves despinning happening at exactly the same time that there is unusual heating along the equator. They conclude that "Although one could complain that this combination of despinning stresses and equatorial heating is somewhat contrived, there seem to be few other scenarios that can fit the observations." Scientists don't like having to argue that two different processes were just coincidentally happening at the same time, but they conclude that the coincidence is "not unreasonable" and that "further exploration of an intrusive, extensional origin of the bulge is likely to be fruitful."
The next paper in the session is by Paul Schenk and Jeff Moore, two scientists who do a lot of comparative studies of icy moons all over the outer solar system. For this talk they focused on Dione, in particular on the evidence for eruptive volcanism on Dione's surface. They found that Dione has all sorts of geomorphological features that are probably associated with volcanusm that are just not observed on other icy satellites -- smooth plains centered on a couple of possible big volcanic complexes, and chasms that radiate out from those complexes. Just another indication that each moon is a world unto itself, with its own fascinating and unique geologic history. Naturally, some of the most interesting features on Dione march off into an area that hasn't yet been imaged very well by Cassini -- the north pole. It hasn't been imaged very well yet because it's been in winter darkness since the spacecraft arrived at Saturn. That's changing soon, and Paul and Jeff argue that mapping the north pole should be "a priority target during future close encounters with Dione."The next paper, by Torrence Johnson and a few coauthors, looked closely at the shape of Phoebe. Remember Phoebe? It's an outer, irregular satellite of Saturn, so distant from the planet that Cassini got its one and only close look at it more than two weeks before it got into Saturn orbit, on its way into the system. Its orbit indicates it has more in common with the irregular outer moons than the classical inner icy moons, and scientists have always suspected it didn't form in the Saturn system, but is instead a body that formed elsewhere and was later captured into Saturn orbit. Johnson's abstract discusses Phoebe's shape and finds that, lumpy as Phoebe looks, it's actually more regular than you'd expect for a body its size, and that regular shape combined with its unusually (for a Saturnian moon) high density of 1.9 grams per cubic centimeter suggests that it has a layered internal structure, meaning it's differentiated, and that "it may be typical of
any objects in the outer solar system including the present KBOs and TNOs" (Kuiper belt objects and trans-Neptunian objects). That's been suggested before, but it's always satisfying when further research bears out the results of preliminary studies.
The next abstract, by Sami Asmar and coauthors, provided one of the first reports I've seen on attempts to determine the internal structure of a moon (in this case, Rhea) from radio tracking data. In brief, the results are inconclusive. The problem is that they don't know whether Rhea is "hydrostatic" or not, meaning that it's not known if its shape represents an equilibrium between the forces due to gravity and the forces due to its spin. In brief, despite approaching the problem from a couple of different directions (radio tracking and looking at topographic profiles of the moon from observations of the shape of its limb silhouetted against black space), they still don't know whether it's hydrostatic or not.
The next paper, by Zhang and Nimmo, looked at the orbital evolution of Enceladus and Dione (the two are linked: Enceladus and Dione are in an orbital resonance, where Enceladus orbits twice for every single Dione orbit) and went through some mathematical modeling to see if there was likely to be an ocean underneath either of the two. The result: Enceladus probably does have one, and the idea that Dione does "cannot be ruled out."
The next paper, by Susan Kieffer and coauthors, is notable because it overturns an earlier result that I've quoted a lot. In the past, it's been argued that Enceladus' plumes are made of roughly equal amounts (by mass) of vapor and solid ice. But Kieffer's study shows "that the mass of ice in the column is significantly less than the mass of water vapor....This implies that the plume is dominated by vapor and can easily be produced by sublimation with recondensation. Therefore, [there is] no compelling criterion for consideration of a liquid water reservoir." To translate, you don't need near-surface liquid water to produce the amount of ice crystals seen in the plumes. (However, I don't think this study addresses another argument for the presence of near-surface liquid water, which is the high heat flow observed at the surface.)
The final abstract in the session, by Francis Nimmo and Bruce Bills, takes issue with the conclusions of the Cassini radar team, that Titan's crust is spinning faster than its core, evidence for its crust being "decoupled" from its core by an internal ocean of liquid water. They argue that Titan's orbit may be precessing, in which case "the spin rate must be somewhat faster in order to match the sum of orbital mean motion and apsidal precession rates," so that it is a synchronous rotator through and through.
All in all, icy moons seem to be a really dynamic field of study, and there's a lot more for Cassini to do to illuminate what's going on at Saturn's moons, and lots more to learn from a future Jupiter satellite mission, and a later mission back to study Saturn's moons will not be a waste. Also, based on my writeup above, it seems like Francis Nimmo is a real troublemaker, throwing a wrench into a lot of people's conclusions, and sometimes advocating for two different explanations for something that's going on at an icy moon. (No criticism meant here: when nobody really knows what's going on, it seems that exploring lots of different possibilities is the right way to go!)