Mini-SAR: Another Chandrayaan-1 instrument checks in
Posted by Emily Lakdawalla
2009/01/16 03:57 CST
EDIT March 3, 2009: In the entry below, I hypothesize about why the Chandrayaan-1 images look less crisp to me than the SAR images I'm accustomed to seeing. Neither of my hypotheses was correct! Paul Spudis explains what's going on at his blog at Air & Space Magazine.
NASA has released some images, the first to be seen by the public, from the Mini-SAR instrument on India's Chandrayaan-1 orbiter. Mini-SAR is one of two instruments that NASA contributed to the Indian mission, the other being the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (or M3).
The acronym SAR stands for Synthetic Aperture Radar. It's a tricky method of using a radio antenna to produce amazingly detailed images. Briefly, the radio dish is used to broadcast a chirp signal at the surface (a signal that varies in frequency with time), off to one side of the spacecraft, and then it listens for the echo. The echo comes back from a large area of the surface, but it comes back later from parts of the surface that are farther from the spacecraft. Also, the reflections that come from the direction that the spacecraft is moving are Doppler-shifted to higher frequencies, while the reflections that come from behind the spacecraft are Doppler-shifted to lower frequencies. By doing some complicated computational deconvolution of the reflected signal, radio scientists can produce an image of which areas within the SAR beam were brighter reflectors and which dimmer. SAR images usually come in long skinny strips, parallel to (but to one side of) the ground track of the orbiting spacecraft; these strips are often called "swaths" (which is a term I use all the time and don't define frequently enough. My bad.)
Here's one of the first Mini-SAR swaths on a lunar pole, in this case the south pole.See how the floor of Haworth crater is black in the base image? The SAR image clearly shows lots of detail in there -- many small craters. They may look like bumps to you instead of craters because the direction of illumination in the SAR swath is from the lower left, very different from the direction of illumination of the base map, which is from the top.As I mentioned above, the following two hypotheses aren't right -- check Paul Spudis's blog for the explanation. I have to say that this image looks less crisp than the SAR images I'm accustomed to seeing. There's a couple of reasons why that might be true. The first is that the Moon is just less crisp than other places I've seen in SAR images (namely, Venus, Earth, and Titan). The Moon's surface is very, very, very ancient; most of the big craters were made billions of years ago. In the time since the big craters formed, uncountable numbers of smaller impacts have softened the originally sharp edges of lunar topographic features. The Moon has basically no atmosphere, so even the tiniest micrometeoroids can crash to the surface and slowly wear down the rough edges on rocks. All the other places we've had SAR instruments have significant atmospheres and (relatively) recent geologic activity. This is no accident. Geologic activity helps make an atmosphere by releasing gases. And use SAR in such places because the atmosphere blocks sunlight, so we need a radio instrument to see through it.
The other reason I can think of that the images don't look as crisp as ones from Venus, Earth, and Titan is because the Mini-SAR is a miniaturized instrument. The instrument website says it masses only 7 kilograms, which is pretty small. Usually there's a tradeoff between capability and mass in space instruments.
According to the National Space Science Data Center web page on the instrument, it's supposed to take only two weeks to acquire all the data for a complete mosaic of both north and south poles. But I don't expect to see the actual mosaic that quickly. To make SAR data look really good requires an incredibly precise understanding of the position and velocity of the spacecraft at every moment, and with the Moon's notoriously lumpy gravity field, there are bound to be some pretty significant uncertainties in Chandrayaan-1's position. It'll take a lot of calculation and recalculation to make the SAR images look really good. So we'll have to be patient, but it'll be worth it, to get the first clear look at the surface of the lunar poles.
Or read more blog entries about: