A launch to Neptune in 2019?
Posted by Emily Lakdawalla
07-11-2008 14:01 CST
The Outer Planets Assessment Group, or OPAG, is meeting this week at Arizona State University, primarily to examine the progress of the two major Outer Planets flagship mission studies, one of which will be selected by NASA and ESA in January. The two missions that are being considered are a Europa Jupiter System Mission or EJSM and a Titan Saturn System Mission or TSSM. Not long after the meeting is over, the presentations on these proposals should be posted to the OPAG website, so if you're curious about them, go check those presentations out.
I generally don't pay a lot of attention to missions that are still on the drawing board, because I have quite enough to keep me busy just following missions that are active or are just about to launch. So I've been actively avoiding learning about EJSM or TSSM -- I'll pay more attention when one of them gets selected. Still, my curiosity was piqued by a presentation that was on the OPAG schedule for yesterday afternoon: the proposal of a New Frontiers mission to Neptune. So I tuned in to listen to that.First, some background: "flagship" means a more-than-one-billion-dollar mission, usually more like two billion, and there aren't ever going to be more than one of those sent to the outer planets per decade. Cassini's a flagship; the previous one was Galileo, and the one before that was Voyager. Next down the line is New Frontiers missions, which are in the ballpark of 800 million dollars. New Horizons, which launched in 2005 and is on its way to Pluto, and Juno, under construction for a 2011 launch, are the first two in the New Frontiers line; twice a decade seems to be the pace for New Frontiers. You can't do much to an outer planet for anything cheaper than that.
The next flagship mission to an outer planet will either be going to Jupiter or Saturn. That'll be active in the mid 2020s. There is some desire for the next flagship mission after that to go to the Neptune system. But, for a variety of reasons, it's not going to happen anytime soon -- not until the 2040s at least -- and there's no telling whether a compelling case will be made for the next flagship to go to the planet, Jupiter or Saturn, that didn't get a mission in the 2020s. So it could be a long, long, long time before we visit Neptune (nevermind Uranus).Yet the Neptune system is an increasingly interesting target, not only because Neptune itself is worth studying, but also because it has in its orbit a (likely) captured Kuiper belt object, Triton, and because astronomers are discovering more and more Neptune-mass objects orbiting other stars. We've done in-situ studies of the gas giant planets in our solar system, which inform our studies of large extrasolar planets, but we've only studied the ice giants Uranus and Neptune with the 1970s technology of Voyager.
What to do? Candy Hansen and Heidi Hammel are proposing a mission called Argo that could update our understanding of the Neptune mission at the much lower cost of a New Frontiers mission. But at that price, it would not be an orbiter; it would be a flyby mission. Would it really be worth sending just a flyby mission to Neptune?
If a Neptune flyby was all that we would get out of a New Frontiers mission, the answer would probably be no. But Argo proposes to study Neptune and Triton in a flyby, then go on to a couple of Kuiper belt objects, just as New Horizons is going first to Pluto, then to a couple of Kuiper belt objects. In fact, to keep costs in line, Argo's design would borrow a lot from New Horizons.There's a critical difference in the Kuiper belt phases of New Horizons and the proposed Argo mission, though. New Horizons' main goal in the Kuiper belt -- the site that the scientists chose to visit -- is Pluto. After that, it won't have a lot of choice about which other Kuiper belt objects it can visit. It will definitely fly by at least one, hopefully two, very small objects that happen to lie within the narrow, 0.9-degree cone of opportunity that it can get to following its flyby of Pluto. It will be interesting and valuable to study these objects, but they'll be chosen more by happenstance than by intention.
Argo, on the other hand, would be flying by Neptune, which is the third-most-massive planet in the solar system. Flying by Neptune opens up a huge cone of opportunity; with a gravity assist from Neptune, Argo could choose a course into the Kuiper belt that lies anywhere within 60 degrees of its Neptune trajectory -- a total breadth of 120 degrees -- and that's without using any propulsive assistance at all. The Argo mission could choose to visit any one of nine large (400 kilometers in diameter or larger) Kuiper belt objects, some of which are binary (two for the price of one -- like Pluto and Charon), or any one of 40 objects between 200 and 400 kilometers in diameter. I assume that, if the mission were to be selected, they'd eventually settle on a course that could take it past two or more objects of diverse types, trading among all the variables of interest to the science team -- size, surface properties, number of companions, and so on.And to get to Neptune, Argo would fly by Jupiter and Saturn first. Really, in a way, it's like doing another Voyager 2, except you'd exchange Uranus for a couple of Kuiper belt objects, plus you'd be doing it with technology that is three or four decades more advanced, and you'd be doing it at the cost of a New Frontiers mission instead of a flagship mission. We'd get an intermediate view of Neptune, to fill in the many, many decades that will separate our first look from the eventual flagship mission, whenever it finally gets there.
It's a neat idea. It can't happen in the next New Frontiers opportunity because the U.S. doesn't have enough plutonium available for the next New Frontiers to be nuclear-powered. So it has to be New Frontiers 4, which implies a launch date in 2019 or 2020, with the Neptune flyby happening around 2027. Just to be clear, Argo hasn't been selected for New Frontiers 4; the announcement of opportunity for New Frontiers 4 won't happen until 2013, and then Argo will have to compete against all the other no doubt compelling proposals. It's not a done deal, just a neat idea.
There was a funny moment in the presentation, when Hansen put up a grid identifying the positions on the science team that will eventually need to be filled. With the spacecraft not launching for a decade, and not reaching its first real science target for two decades, now might not be the best time to identify the science team. "It's not going to be any of us," joked someone from the audience. It's true; there will certainly be some people on that team who are now established researchers, but the majority would likely be people who are currently in graduate school or college. Maybe even high school. Are you in high school right now? Want to drive a spacecraft to Neptune? Argo might just be your chance.
Or read more blog entries about:
Fifteen years ago, Society members and passionate space advocates like you helped save the Pluto mission. Now we can do the same for missions to Europa and Mars.
Join over 27,600 people who have completed their petition and consider a donation to support advocacy efforts.