Join Donate

Emily LakdawallaAugust 16, 2007

Ices, Oceans, and Fire: Tuesday morning: Goo-ology

The penultimate talk, given by Jeff Kargel, was titled "Theory of Geochemical/Geological Homology Applied to Hydrocarbon and Organic Substances on Icy Satellites and Other Solid Planetary Objects," which needs some translation; I'd call it "Does comparative planetology work at all, especially for Titan?" This talk was so useful that I asked Jeff for a copy of his Powerpoint and am reproducing his text almost entirely here, with some expansion for explanatory purposes. Thank you, Jeff!

He opened with a slide stating a provocative claim: "Mars is Mars-like, NOT Earth-like." (The statement was made by Nick Hoffman, he of "White Mars" fame.) Jeff commented that he could not but agree with the first half of the comment, but thought the second half worth exploring. Mars is, indeed, very different to Earth in a number of important ways:

With all these differences, you can't expect comparable processes and landforms on both planets. Furthermore, even when the same materials are present on both planets, they behave differently under different conditions. If Mars is so un-Earth-like, how Earth-like could Titan or any other icy satellite possibly be? Is there any hope at all for comparative planetology?
Panorama of the channels at the Huygens landing site

Panorama of the channels at the Huygens landing site
Jeff says there is hope for comparative planetology, and here's his reasoning.