Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Casey Profile Picture Thumbnail

Sequestration Claims its First Victim at NASA

Conference travel and participation severely restricted

Posted by Casey Dreier

14-03-2013 19:18 CDT

Topics: Space Policy, FY2014 NASA Budget

NASA released new rules severely limiting travel and scientific conference attendance, yesterday, in what is the first major effect of Sequestration on the agency.

A letter from NASA Administrator Charles Bolden outlined the new restrictions, which include a ban on travel outside of the continental United States, a limit of fifty NASA scientists at any given conference, and new requirements that a physical presence at the conference is necessary. Key excerpts (emphasis mine):

Domestic Conferences

Criteria - NASA will limit domestic conference attendance to those conferences that meet all of the following criteria. The Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) will determine whether a conference as a whole meets these criteria:

  1. The conference is essential and/or necessary (as compared to discretionary or preferable)
  2. A scientific or technical presentation at a scientific or technical conference meets these criteria, but the other criteria must also be met.
  3. The conference contributes to the agency's core mission.
  4. The employee attending is substantively involved with the conference (moderating panels and attending-only do not meet this criteria).
  5. There are no alternative methods of participating (e.g., phone, video conference, or pre-recorded video message).

50 Person Limit - Assuming the criteria above are met, NASA will limit the total attendance at a domestic conference to 50 persons, including both civil service and JPL and other contractor employees, unless the conference is approved to exceed the 50 person limit by OCFO.

Foreign Conferences - Foreign conference participation and sponsorship is prohibited unless the conference as a whole is specifically approved by OCFO. As of 3/12/13, no foreign conferences are approved by OCFO. Pending a future waiver by OCFO, attendance at any foreign conference is prohibited.

Of special note is that this letter defines "foreign" travel as anything outside of the continental United States. Sorry Hawaii and Alaska!

LPSC 2008 conferenceFewer people, fewer ideas at scientific conferences are the result of the Sequester at NASA
Ted Stryk

So, why is this really bad?

Conference travel for scientists is a crucial aspect of their professions. A conference is an exchange of ideas, where scientists can get together, present results, hear new ones, and generally cross-pollinate. Serendipitous interactions between scientists can lead to unexpected collaborations. This type of intermingling is understood as a crucial component of creative endeavors, reflected in a variety of environments (for example, the layout of the Pixar company's main headquarters encourages employee interaction).

NASA will also completely pull out of foreign conferences, reducing the amount of interaction with crucial scientific communities outside the United States. This particularly effects Europe, since they are major partners on many NASA missions.

I am not upset at NASA management. This is likely the least-worst option they had to choose from. The Sequester was never meant to be implemented because the effects were supposed to be so nasty that Congress would never let it happen. So of course this decision doesn't make sense; the Sequester by definition prevents most of these cuts from making any sense. The agency is trying very hard to avoid layoffs and furloughs and cutting conference travel so severely most likely saves jobs.

Even so, there will now be a NASA-sized hole at major conferences. Fewer ideas will mix, fewer collaborations will begin, and the world will lose a little bit of the excitement and potential it once had.

It's tragic on its face, but the fact that this didn't have to happen makes it more so.

Update 2013-03-14 9:30 pm PDT

Some more info via Twitter, including the excellent point that Puerto Rico (home of the Arecibo Observatory) is considered "foreign" and thus all travel is forbidden (including for those who work at the Observatory):

See other posts from March 2013


Or read more blog entries about: Space Policy, FY2014 NASA Budget


Tailspin45: 03/14/2013 07:47 CDT

Sounds like a argument for better streaming coverage at conferences and a new mobile app that allows interactive virtual "stand around and shoot the bull." What the world needs ins't a better 5¢ cigar, it's more cheap bandwidth!

Michael Nolan: 03/14/2013 09:48 CDT

Puerto Rico is also OCONUS fwiw. We're not sure whether we can leave...

Stephen van Vuuren: 03/15/2013 10:31 CDT

Face to face is still really important. I was supposed to meet with several JPL people at LPSC to show work in progress footage on my film project, but got the word yesterday none of them are now coming.

Larry Roark: 03/20/2013 08:56 CDT

Wonder if the U.S.P.S. who are now in SF for a big conference and social outing got the same marching orders?!

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Planetary Defense

An asteroid or comet headed for Earth is the only large-scale natural disaster we can prevent. Working together to fund our Shoemaker NEO Grants for astronomers, we can help save the world.


Featured Images

LightSail 2 and Prox-1
Bill Nye at LightSail 2 pre-ship review
LightSail 2 pre-ship review team photo
Swirling maelstrom
More Images

Featured Video

Class 9: Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!