Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

DPS 2010: Triton's craters, a friendly dispute

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

21-10-2010 11:33 CDT


Two weeks later, I have finally found some time to return to my notes from the Division of Planetary Sciences annual meeting. At the end of the Tuesday morning session on Pluto (October 5), there was a bit of an orphan talk by Bill McKinnon on the origin of small impact craters on Triton. I guess people now consider Triton to be more at home among Pluto, Eris, and the other trans-Neptunian objects than it is among the moons of Saturn, which would have been the other place that the DPS organizers could have stuck the talk. Bill's talk mostly sought to debunk the conclusions of another paper.

A relatively new version of Voyager 2's highest-resolution mosaic on Triton put together by Paul Schenk shows lots of tiny little craters on Triton's cryovolcanic plains, most of them less than 20 kilometers in diameter. Paul, with coauthor Kevin Zahnle, published a paper in 2007 in which they proposed that the 100 or so impact craters visible in the mosaic are "sesquinaries," resulting from an impact onto or disruption of one of Neptune's other moons, an event that would have created a population of shrapnel in Neptune orbit that could have produced all (or, at least, most) of Triton's craters in one event. If this explanation were true, the craters could have formed as recently as yesterday (geologically speaking). The abstract of the Schenk and Zahnle paper is fairly easy to read, as such things go, so I'll repost it here:


NASA / JPL / Ted Stryk

Voyager 2 acquired the images for this high-resolution mosaic of Triton on August 25, 1989. The south pole is at the right; several of Triton's famous south polar geysers are visible. Toward the equator at right, Triton is covered with a strange "cantaloupe terrain".
New mapping reveals 100 probable impact craters on Triton wider than 5 km diameter. All of the probable craters are within 90° of the apex of Triton's orbital motion (i.e., all are on the leading hemisphere) and have a cosine density distribution with respect to the apex. This spatial distribution is difficult to reconcile with a heliocentric (Sun-orbiting) source of impactors, be it ecliptic comets, the Kuiper Belt, the scattered disk, or tidally-disrupted temporary satellites in the style of Shoemaker

See other posts from October 2010


Or read more blog entries about:


Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Planetary Defense

An asteroid or comet headed for Earth is the only large-scale natural disaster we can prevent. Working together to fund our Shoemaker NEO Grants for astronomers, we can help save the world.


Featured Images

LightSail 2 and Prox-1
Bill Nye at LightSail 2 pre-ship review
LightSail 2 pre-ship review team photo
Swirling maelstrom
More Images

Featured Video

Class 9: Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!