Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty

Headshot of Emily Lakdawalla

Phoenix sol 24: A disappearance from Dodo?

Posted by Emily Lakdawalla

19-06-2008 17:36 CDT


As promised yesterday, Phoenix' sol 24 seems to have been a very busy one for imaging. I've been checking the raw images site regularly throughout the day (using the handy-dandy download tool Mike Howard built into his Midnight Mars Browser software) and about 100 images have rolled in so far from the mast-mounted camera alone. There's only been one from the robotic arm camera so I haven't bothered to update my pages yet. Mark Lemmon has summarized sol 24 as "dig Snow White 2, hit hard stuff." Indeed, they seem to have dug a nice trench perfectly parallel to the original Snow White trench that they dug on sol 20. You can see the "before" image here, and the "after" one here. The two black lines crossing the second image are "data dropouts," and look like the type that typically result from hiccups on the Earth end of the data transmission pipeline. Typically, such images might be flagged as needing to be retransmitted on later communications passes. However, because Phoenix is not saving anything to flash memory right now because of the sol 22 anomaly, my guess is that those images are now gone for good. We'll see. (And no, I haven't heard anything more about the sol 22 anomaly; I'll try to get an update for y'all tomorrow.)

But much more interesting, to me, than the new trench at Snow White is what's going on within the old trench at Dodo. Here is an animation of two sets of color images, the first set captured on sol 20, the second set captured on sol 24. Before you look at it, please consider this warning: this animation was created from raw images from the Phoenix website. Raw images have an automatic contrast stretch applied, which forces the brightest pixels in each image to perfectly white values. This stretch is different for every single image, so you cannot trust brightness comparisons anywhere where some pixels are pure white (the same goes for pure black). That's very important. Actually, comparing absolute brightness values between raw images is also hazardous, but you can usually get away with comparing relative brightness values within one image, which is what I'm about to do. All this is a long-winded way of saying, take the following with a grain of salt!
Disappearing act?

NASA / JPL / UA / Texas A & M / color composite and animation by Daniel Crotty

Disappearing act?
Flipping back and forth between two color images captured on sols 20 and 24 of the Phoenix mission shows that some clods of bright material that were visible in the shadowed part of the trench on sol 20 were no longer there on sol 24. The changes in the sunlit area of the trench should be ignored, as the automatic contrast stretch applied to the raw images released by the Phoenix mission saturated the brightest pixels, but did so differently in the two sets of images, so they cannot be directly compared.
Now, do your best to ignore the white stuff in the sunlit part of the top of the trench. Those are pixels you can't trust because they've been stretched to pure white values. Concentrate instead on what's going on at the left side of the trench, within the shadow cast by the trench wall. If you look in that area, on sol 20, you can see that there are some clods or clumps of material that are brighter than their surroundings. If you look again on sol 24, you can see that although the underlying soil is undisturbed, those bright clods are absent.

Seeing this happen is exactly why the science team is doing "monitoring" of a no-longer-active trench. The team still doesn't know whether the bright material in the trench is ice or salt. It's at the correct depth to be ice, but they haven't gotten that bright material into any of their chemical analysis labs yet. One test they could perform is to see if the bright material changed over time once it was exposed to the Martian sun and wind. If the bright material is ice, you'd expect that the exposure to the dry Martian air and to heating from the Sun would cause it to sublimate -- turn to vapor and disappear.

In this animation, produced from raw images, bright stuff seems to disappear. I won't say that this proves the stuff is ice, because I'm not a member of the science team and I don't have access to the real, calibrated data. But you can bet I've got my ears perked up to see what the science team has to say about this little disappearing act!

See other posts from June 2008


Or read more blog entries about:


Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

Essential Advocacy

Our Advocacy Program provides each Society member a voice in the process.

Funding is critical. The more we have, the more effective we can be, translating into more missions, more science, and more exploration.


Featured Images

Comparison of Schiaparelli and Opportunity landing locations
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera image of Curiosity landing site
Schiaparelli landing site, after landing attempt
Ewen Whitaker
More Images

Featured Video

The Planetary Post - Star Trek 50th Anniversary

Watch Now

Space in Images

Pretty pictures and
awe-inspiring science.

See More

Join The Planetary Society

Let’s explore the cosmos together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!