Join Donate

Brendan CurryMay 9, 2019

Hearing Recap: Keeping Our Sights on Mars

A Review of NASA’s Deep Space Plans and Lunar Proposal

Overview: On May 8, the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics held a hearing entitled "Keeping our Sights on Mars: A Review of NASA's Deep Space Plans".

Members in Attendance:


Sample Q&A:

Subcommittee Chair Horn: NASA has promised Congress an amended budget to be delivered April 15, and then May 1. It still has not been delivered yet. What is the cause of this delay?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: This acceleration is a serious challenge with many components. We want to present Congress a complete and completely integrated plan and budget. We are taking our time to present as much detail as we can. It may be delayed for a week or two.

Mr. Sirangelo: We want to ensure we get this right.

Subcommittee Chair Horn: Who has final sign-off?

Mr. Sirangelo: The NASA Administrator and OMB.

Subcommittee Chair Horn: Will NASA be asking Congress for new authority for new types of contracting mechanisms?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: We may be seeking a variety of authorities depending on what part of the mission architecture.

Subcommittee Chair Horn: What is the status of NASA's space suits? Is NASA developing brand new suits?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: We will be developing new suits based on our existing suits.

Subcommittee Ranking Member Babin: Do all you on the panel agree that a real space program should provide commercial opportunities where appropriate, but also develop strategic capabilities that only the government can develop and use?

All panelists: Agree.

Subcommittee Ranking Member Babin: Should international partners be on the critical path?

Dr. Lunine: For Mars, yes.

Full Committee Chair Bernice-Johnson: What is the status of SLS and Orion?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: The program is looking good.

Mr. Sirangelo: This program will also result in new technologies as well as enable new kinds of science.

Mr. Faulconer: This acceleration will produce usable technologies and science.

Full Committee Ranking Member Lucas: What is the biggest challenge to this accelerated program?

Mr. Faulconer: Institutional resistance.

Full Committee Ranking Member Lucas: What has NASA learned from previous attempts to return Americans to the moon and going on to Mars that failed?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: Compared to those previous efforts, we already have hardware being built and tested right now. We are also building an architecture where there are no technological dead-ends.

Mr. Sirangelo: We also have a much more robust commercial space industry able to provide capabilities.

Rep. Brooks: What can you tell this committee about recent tests and concerns about the parachutes on Starliner and Dragon?

Dr. Sanders: The tests have provided insight which may result in some redesign.

Mr. Gerstenmaier: There was a failure with the Dragon. We are investigating what went wrong.

Rep. Brooks: How much more money will NASA need to accelerate the lunar program? Where will the money come from?

Mr. Gerstenmaier: I cannot at this time get into details while OMB is reviewing our proposal.

Rep. Beyer: I assume we will keep working with our international partners? Will we bring the Chinese along for lunar and Mars missions?

Mr. Sirangelo: We will very likely keep working with our ISS partners. As for China, we at NASA are prevented by law from talking with the Chinese.

#    #    #

Read more: NASA budget, Space Policy, FY2020 NASA Budget, Future Robotic Missions

You are here:
Brendan Curry Head Shot
Brendan Curry

Chief of Washington D.C. Operations for The Planetary Society
Read more articles by Brendan Curry

Comments & Sharing
Bill Nye and people
Let's Change the World

Become a member of The Planetary Society and together we will create the future of space exploration.

Join Today

The Planetary Fund

Help advance robotic and human space exploration, defend our planet, and search for life.


"We're changing the world. Are you in?"
- CEO Bill Nye

Sign Up for Email Updates