Help Shape the Future of Space Exploration

Join The Planetary Society Now  arrow.png

Join our eNewsletter for updates & action alerts

    Please leave this field empty
Blogs

Casey Profile Picture Thumbnail

Your Europa Mission Primer of the Day

Posted by Casey Dreier

08-04-2014 9:35 CDT

Topics: Explaining Policy, Europa, Space Policy, Future Mission Concepts

If you've been following our calls for NASA to explore Europa (or even better, if you haven't), and have questions like, "why haven't we explored Europa already?" and "I thought NASA was working on the Europa Clipper mission?," Jeff Foust of the Space Review wrote up an excellent piece reviewing the recent history of humanity's effort to explore this compelling, watery moon:

NASA has been working on reducing a cost of a Europa orbiter mission, in large part by no longer making it an orbiter. The concept now favored within the space agency is something called “Europa Clipper.” Instead of going into orbit around Europa, the spacecraft would instead go into orbit around Jupiter and make repeated close flybys of the moon. The most recent mission designs involve 45 flybys of Europa over three and a half years, with the vast majority of them coming within 100 kilometers of the moon’s surface. That approach minimizes the spacecraft’s exposure to radiation as well as propellant needed for entering orbit around Europa.

That work on Europa Clipper has largely been done at the insistence of Congress, rather than by NASA’s own initiative. In the final fiscal year 2013 budget, Congress set aside $75 million of NASA’s planetary sciences budget specifically for Europa mission studies, and followed that up with $80 million in the fiscal year 2014 budget, even though NASA requested no money in either year’s budget request for Europa. The text of the final 2014 appropriations bill noted that the $80 million “shall be for pre-formulation and/or formulation activities for a mission that meets the science goals outlined for the Jupiter Europa mission in the most recent planetary science decadal survey.”

Read the full piece on the Space Review, where he also delves into the potential role of the Space Launch System to launch a Europa mission and how the recently-discovered plumes impact mission design.

 
See other posts from April 2014

 

Or read more blog entries about: Explaining Policy, Europa, Space Policy, Future Mission Concepts

Comments:

Paul McCarthy: 04/14/2014 02:19 CDT

The full piece is compelling. Particularly interesting is the reference to Chris McKay et al very recently arguing for Enceladus sample return, and then discussion in the Comments section about the cost effectiveness of developing both Europa and Enceladus sample return in tandem! The cost-efficiencies and mind boggling science-yield of simultaneously developing and flying both Europa and Enceladus sample return missions are EXACTLY the kind of highly-ambitious but entirely logical and efficient set-up and thinking that we need. Until we have the capability to build a mission that can spectroscopically determine probable life on an exoplanet, sample returns from Enceladus and Europa are not just the best possible Planetary missions, they are the most exciting possible space missions of any kind, period! Plonk them on the SLS.

Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to submit a comment. Log in now.
Facebook Twitter Email RSS AddThis

Blog Search

JOIN THE
PLANETARY SOCIETY

Our Curiosity Knows No Bounds!

Become a member of The Planetary Society and together we will create the future of space exploration.

Join Us

Featured Images

NavCam view of comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko on August 31, 2014

South Georgia island
ATV-5 and a waning moon
Moscow at night
More Images

Featured Video

View Larger »

Fly to an Asteroid!

Travel to Bennu on the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft!

Send your name

Join the New Millennium Committee

Let’s invent the future together!

Become a Member

Connect With Us

Facebook! Twitter! Google+ and more…
Continue the conversation with our online community!