NASA Administrator Highlights Advanced Propulsion Systems at JPL
An ion engine will be used on the proposed asteroid retrieval mission
Posted by Casey Dreier
2013/05/23 06:18 CDT
I stopped by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory today to see NASA Administrator Charles Bolden talk about the proposed Asteroid Retrieval Mission. The Planetary Society is ambivalent about the mission; though the concept of moving an asteroid and exploring it is compelling and could produce fascinating science, it's not clear how NASA plans to pay for it. We don't want this mission to raid existing science programs.
NASA is going around the country trying to sell this mission to its various constituencies. Today, the NASA Administrator was highlighting the advanced solar electric propulsion engine developed at JPL. Similar hardware has already flown in space, most notably on the Dawn mission to Vesta and Ceres.
This special type of engine uses ionized xenon to generate small amounts of force over long periods of time. It's more efficient than chemical propulsion, but it does require extra time to achieve similar amounts change in velocity. Even though this engine is currently in use on a real mission, the requirements of the asteroid retrieval mission call for a much larger, more robust ion engine than previously existed. For example, Dawn had about 450 kg of xenon "fuel" to utilize throughout the course of its lifetime. For asteroid retrieval, NASA needs about 10,000 kg. This is due to the much larger size of the spacecraft plus the heavy asteroid itself.
Bolden said that he considers asteroid retrieval to be not a science or human exploration mission, but an investment in technology. This is the slightly strange way NASA is selling the concept, even though humans will visit the captured asteroid and science will be done on any samples they retrieve. My guess is that neither science nor human spaceflight wants to pay for this mission, so NASA administration emphasizes the technology focus in order to ease their minds.
I was able to ask about NASA's plans to reprogram away the additional funding allocated to Planetary Science in the 2013 budget. Bolden responded that NASA is committed to the Decadal Survey with the 2020 Mars Rover and making it a caching mission. I wasn't sure if he didn't understand my question or just didn't want to answer it. My guess is the latter.