|
The Planetary Society BlogBy Emily LakdawallaPhobos-Grunt, the morning afterNov. 9, 2011 | 08:04 PST | 16:04 UTC
21:12 UT: Corrected the sentences regarding the role of Ted Molczan in notifying the public about what Russian mission controllers knew about the state of the spacecraft.
Neither of these two Fregat burns happened. As explained in a RIA Novosti story posted at 07:26 today, one reason for the initial confusion was that both of these burns were to happen out of sight of Russian ground stations. So Russia had previously appealed to amateur astronomers in South America to find and track the spacecraft. So it was an amateur astronomer, Ted Molczan, who was the source of the first public notification that there was a "serious problem." As a result of his leadership of some amateur efforts to track the spacecraft as it passed over South America, Molczan had previously had contact with the Phobos-Grunt mission, so he was informed by the mission of an apparent problem and quickly spread the information to his mailing list. He wrote that "Observers are requested to attempt to discover the spacecraft in the initial LEO parking orbit." After the first planned burn, the orbit had not changed at all from the initial parking orbit, and there were two objects occupying that orbit. It was later confirmed that the second object was the upper stage of the Zenit, separated from Phobos-Grunt. Another viewer looking for the burn to happen was Space Station astronaut Mike Fossum. I'm told by someone from ISS Mission control that "Commander Mike Fossum got up in the middle of the night specifically to look for the probe and get a view of the departure burn. As you are probably aware, it appears no burns were completed. The crew reported they were able to see the probe glinting in the sun prior to the burn and never saw a rocket firing and then of course the vehicle did not accelerate form their viewpoint as had been expected." Fossum was reporting this over the Space to Ground communication loop, which, he said, people can listen to on various websites -- did anybody hear this? Is there a recording somewhere? The fact that the burns did not happen was officially confirmed by Baikonur head Vladimir Popovkin in a story posted by the RIA Novosti agency at 02:13 UT November 9. A bilingual commenter on yesterday's post provided a nuanced translation of his statements, which I'll repost here: "We've had a rough night. We could not locate the spacecraft, and now found its coordinates. It turned out that the propulsion installation did not activate. There was no first or second burn." said Popovkin.An ITAR-TASS story posted at 06:33 was based on the same statements by Popovkin. A BBC News story last updated at 07:48 in English also seems to be based on the same statements but includes some slightly different quotes: Reports suggest the spacecraft attempted to orientate itself in space using the stars, failed to pick them up and therefore did not execute the firings as planned.Recovery attempts to begin shortly An official statement from Roscosmos today states (in Google translation) "the spacecraft is operating normally" and that "all the parameters of the spacecraft motion [are] currently defined." Here is Anatoly Zak's translation/summary of the complete statement: Only on the afternoon, November 9, Roskosmos issued an official press-release stating that two first post-launch contacts with the spacecraft had showed normal operations of the spacecraft according to the flight plan. However engine firings planned beyond the range of ground stations did not take place. Currently, all necessary parameters of the spacecraft motion had been determined, the statement said, however due to low orbit of the spacecraft it would not reenter the range of Russian ground stations until 23:00 Moscow Time (14:00 EST) on November 9. Based on the analysis of data, Roskosmos promised to prepare and upload onboard all necessary commands for the resumption of orbital maneuvers. Most importantly, the agency assured that a more accurate estimate of the mission's orbital parameters and power supplies onboard the spacecraft had provided two weeks for the transmission of new instructions to Phobos-Grunt.A little more information appears in an Interfax story posted at 15:40 UT (Google translation): Specialists Space Agency on Wednesday night to try to derive the unit "Phobos-Grunt" on the flight path to Mars, "Interfax-AVN," a source in the space industry.I interpret this to mean that although the spacecraft will be visible from one Russian station at 21:30 (17:30 UT), only Baikonur has equipment necessary to adequately translate the telemetry into information on the exact state of the spacecraft. A somewhat contradictory story is posted on the website Vesti, which states (in Google translation) The first attempt to run the propulsion of interplanetary station "Phobos-soil", which did not come out on the flight path to Mars , will be held this evening, according to ITAR-TASS .The story is referring to ITAR-TASS. But the most recent article I can find from ITAR-TASS is this one, which makes no mention of an attempt to fire the engines today. A story posted at 07:24 by RIA Novosti mentions that the spacecraft is insured against all risks for 1.2 billion rubles. Updates posted at 19:09 UT 14:06 UT: from 1TV.RU: A bit of clarification on last night's statement about it being solvable if a software problem and not if a hardware problem. Igor Tsiolkovsky of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics is quoted as saying (in Google translation): "The station is not oriented correctly. Now the station designers understand what happened. One of the options - a bug in software that is crept into the program must be a mistake. Option Two - denied the star sensor. The station is operational, all the items on it were opened everything works great, it connected." I believe that this means that they are exploring two possible failure modes: a software bug or the failure of the star sensor. Indeed, if the star sensor has failed, that would be very bad. Apart from this issue, however, the spacecraft is otherwise in good health. The same scenarios are discussed at the end of this RIA Novosti story. 17:30 UT: from fr.ria.ru: Google translation from French: "The European Space Agency (ESA) has proposed to Russia to use its radar to make additional contacts with the Phobos Grunt, stuck in Earth orbit after launch to Mars, said Wednesday Rene Pichel Chief representation of the ESA in Moscow." Also, a comment to the pedants who continually point out that it is correct to translate "Фобос-Грунт" to "Phobos-Soil" or transliterate it to "Fobos-Grunt" but find the combination of translation and transliteration into "Phobos-Grunt" an abomination. The fact is that most sources on the Web, including most Russians writing in English, use "Phobos-Grunt." It may be wrong, but it's what is in general use, and I'm not planning on switching my usage at present. If I were to make an all-new website I might convert to "Fobos-Grunt" -- but I'd still have to include the text "Phobos-Grunt" on every page to help people search for any reports on the mission using the most common English version of the name.
CommentsThis comment form is powered by GentleSource Comment Script. It can be included in PHP or HTML files and allows visitors to leave comments on the website.
| ||
Everyone around the world is holding their collective breath hoping for the best on rebooting the mission.
Concerning the russian scientists and engineers, this may turn out to be "their finest hour".
All the best from Portugal.
Also unedited direct downlink of video would be very nice, like the new cam of Earth amongst others. Just the one hour of coverage on NASA-tv each day does not satisfy my appetite...
Wishing the Phobos-Grunt team all the best. And thanks to Emily for the careful coverage.
For those that are curious, you can listen to live ISS space-to-ground communication at all hours of the day on the Nasa TV website. Here is the press release from NASA announcing it a few years back with links:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/sep/HQ_M08182_Mission_Audio.html
This is NOT available on the actual NASA TV channel because they play a lot of pre-recorded programming in the off hours so you have to go online to get it.
So if anyone had been listening late last night when the ISS crew was SUPPOSED to have been asleep you would have heard our Flight Director talking to Commander Fossum about Phobos-Grunt.
Enjoy!
- Ben H.
Space City, Houston, TX
Commanded Fossum and Flight Engineer Satoshi Furukawa are both on twitter. It's possible they may upload some photos that they took last night of the spacecraft but I expect it will just be a bright point of light since no thruster firing occurred. Follow them:
@astro_aggie
@astro_satoshi
- Ben H.
I've a feeling the "ISS audio feed" described in this thread on NSF is what you want:
There's an audio archive linked from there:
If the feed was working at the time, it should be recorded there, I think. Judging by the NSF thread, the feed comes and goes. I haven't tried to work out which file would have the interesting stuff in. (Timestamps are ET, apparently.)
Direct link to the relevant stream is apparently . Right now I don't hear anything :(
Yes, if you follow the link I provided above, if you get to the ISS Station page on the left you can click either "video" or "audio" under "station live". The video link is a Ustream feed that is always either showing live video from inside ISS when the crew is awake or outside views of the Earth when they are asleep. This video feed is also often tied to the space-to-ground comm previously discussed (which is at the "audio") link.
- Ben H.
The ISS crew generally is asleep from GMT 2130 to 0600 and does not talk to the ground for a period of time before they go to bed and after they wake up (we give them private time after work, of course!). So you should not expect to hear anything now, as it is GMT 21:42. Last night was a special case because the crew was up late looking for Phobos-Grunt.
- Ben H.
NSF thread:
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=19337.0
Archive site:
http://issaudio.servehttp.com/
Live stream:
http://www.nasa.gov/178952main_Mission_Audio_UP.asx
I think there is a small mix-up. ;)
http://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=37872
http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00003254/
Thank you Emily for your efforts in digesting all this information.