		Site Map \| Contact Us \| Search:

JOIN

The Planetary Society Blog

By Emily Lakdawalla

Color portrait of asteroid 21 Lutetia

Jul. 21, 2010 | 14:28 PDT | 21:28 UTC

We need your help.
Please donate to support our blog, website, and podcast.

Weblog Archive

Since it doesn't look like the Rosetta mission is going to be releasing any color versions of their Lutetia close-encounter images any time soon, I figured it was time to make one. The data was out there, in the form of two close-approach images that were black-and-white, and one more distant shot in color, but the assembly effort was beyond my skill. Thankfully, Ted Stryk was willing to take a crack at it, and I think he did a great job!

Click to enlarge >

Lutetia in color
This high-resolution, full-globe, color view of the largest asteroid yet visited by a spacecraft is composed from three images taken by Rosetta as it flew past Lutetia on July 10, 2010. Most of the mosaic is from a shot captured just two minutes before closest approach, with a small gap near the terminator (right side) filled in using an image captured at 4 minutes 40 seconds before closest approach. The color is from a much more distant shot. Like most solar system surfaces that have been exposed to space weathering for a long time, Lutetia is reddish in color. A PNG format version is also available. Credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA / color composite by Ted Stryk

Examining the image, I'm struck by how some craters are so much crisper-looking than others. The crisper-looking ones are probably younger. It does seem odd that the surface isn't totally saturated with smaller craters. In this context, "saturated" means that every time a new crater forms, it obliterates an old one; there's no area of the surface that is devoid of craters. But Lutetia's not like that -- it appears to have some smooth or hummocky plains separating craters. My arm-wavey explanation of this is that seismic shaking from one impact crater may smooth out the terrain, erasing other craters, especially smaller ones. If you look, you'll notice that there do seem to be a pretty good set of very big craters underlying the fresher, smaller ones; seismic shaking wouldn't tend to get rid of those. I think.

When he sent me the image, Ted remarked to me something that I'd been thinking: "That is one funky crater on the terminator. I would probably suspect it was of something other than impact origin if it was on, say, the Moon." I totally agree. It's just not the right symmetrical shape, and it has a weird round lip at its edge, and that dark halo above it. I've got no idea what it is, but it doesn't look like the other craters.

Comment Script

Post this page to:

Comments

wow

this is a very...wow image its very spectaculat

#1 - denilson - 07/22/2010 - 00:38

Wow indeed, so, is the colour enhanced in this image at all or would this be what astronauts would see if they looked out their window?

If this is its "true" colour though, then I'm wondering: why is the moon NOT this colour as well?

#2 - Santiago - 07/22/2010 - 12:09

complex shape

Sharp, young craters and old abraded craters seems reasonable to me. Lots of striations--some might be ripples from impact that approaches melting, others might be glancing blows from small, effectively pebble-sized impacts. Probably this was never spherical, always irregular, as chunks of various sizes collided and stuck, or knocked off irregular pieces.

#3 - Ron Masters - 07/26/2010 - 12:22

Start Previous Page


Name

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Title

Comment

This comment form is powered by GentleSource Comment Script. It can be included in PHP or HTML files and allows visitors to leave comments on the website.

Emily's on Twitter! »