WHAT WE DO

JOINRENEWJOIN

 

The Planetary Society Blog

By Emily Lakdawalla




Rosetta's Lutetia pictures

Jul. 10, 2010 | 22:17 PDT | Jul. 11 05:17 UTC
We need your help.
Please donate to support our blog, website, and podcast.
RSS 2.0 News Feed

I saw these pictures for the first time just 10 minutes before boarding my flight back home, and forced myself to download everything I could find as quickly as possible without pausing to actually look at them. (Well, except for the Saturn one, which I knew was coming. That one I had to post without even thinking about it.) Still, even in passing, I caught sight of lovely bowl-shaped craters and Phobos-esque grooves.

Now I have time to study them, and Lutetia is certainly a world different to other asteroids that have been visited before. Here is the last image (at least of the set released this evening by ESA) in which the entire body fit within the OSIRIS field of view; there are a couple more that are higher-resolution, but bits of the edge of the disk are clipped off. The version as released was a bit saturated in the most brightly sunlit areas, so I fiddled with the levels to bring out more detail there. That fiddling did make the dark parts of the disk a bit dim. It's hard to process a picture so that you can see detail everywhere.

A full view of Lutetia from Rosetta
A full view of Lutetia from Rosetta
In a photo captured a bit less than five hours before its closest approach, Rosetta's OSIRIS camera captured a detailed view of the full globe of 21 Lutetia, the largest asteroid yet visited by a spacecraft. Credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA
Definitely click to enlarge the photo. One thing that is wonderful about Rosetta is that unlike all the other framing cameras I know of that are flying in space right now, its CCD detector is capable of capturing photos two thousand pixels square. Other framing cameras, like those on Cassini, the rovers, MESSENGER, Galileo, and Voyager, have many fewer pixels, only a thousand or 800 pixels square. There is so much more detail in the Rosetta photos than I'm used to! Here's the montage I took it from.
Four views of Lutetia from Rosetta
Four views of Lutetia from Rosetta
These four photos were taken by Rosetta's high resolution science camera, OSIRIS, at 8:00, 4:40, 2:00, and 1:50 (hours:minutes) from its closest approach to the asteroid (21) Lutetia at 15:45 on July 10, 2010 UTC. Credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA
Let's tour around some of that detail. The image to the left is five little postage stamp bits from the four high-res images they released, all at their full resolution, though the actual size of one pixel in meters on the ground at Lutetia differs from image to image because Rosetta's distance was changing from photo to photo.

Five detail images cropped from Rosetta's Lutetia views
Five detail images cropped from Rosetta's Lutetia views
Credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA
The first photo shows a ton of nicely bowl-shaped craters, most with lovely raised rims, brought into stark relief by the oblique lighting near the terminator (day-night boundary). Is it my iomagination, or do I see a sort of "bathtub ring" in the two largest craters, maybe even in the third largest crater, a line concentric to the craters' rims of slightly darker material?

The second photo is a bit just on the edge of the limb, a crater with an unusually dark patch of material around it. Is that fresh ejecta surrounding a relatively young crater? Or just a trick of lighting? Fresh ejecta is usually brighter than the surrounding terrain. Dark sprays of material, I associate with volcanoes -- on the Moon and Mercury anyway. I would have a tough time believing volcanism on a tiny old object like Lutetia so I'll look elsewhere for an explanation.

The third (middle) detail photo is the interior of a large crater. Black spots mark large (tens, hundreds of meters across) boulders. I don't think the boulders are inherently darker than the surrounding terrain: I think we are seeing their shadows, both their shadowed sides and the shadows they are casting on the ground. Smoother, boulder-free areas lack shadows, so appear brighter. Just below center is a patch that looks like a smudge in the image. That's no smudge; it's just an area of terrain that is smoother than everything around it, possibly because it is a relatively recent landslide. Note how this area is devoid of small craters; it must be a relatively youthful feature of Lutetia that hasn't yet been pockmarked by small impacts.

Compare that to detail #4, which is covered with small craters, and also linear grooves running left-right across the photo. Lots of small bodies, notably Phobos and Eros, display grooves like this. In fact, at first glance, you'd be forgiven for mistaking Lutetia for Phobos. The jury's still out on what exactly causes the grooves on these small worlds. I'm also interested in the elongate crater to the left of center. Did a little asteroid skip off the surface of Lutetia, bouncing away and leaving this elliptical skidmark instead of a round crater?

Finally, the bottom image: more grooves, but these appear strangely squiggly. I haven't the faintest idea what could cause that.

Fun! And we have yet to see color versions. Color images may possibly be available as early as Sunday (as I write this, I realize it is already Sunday in most of the world), but may not come out until Monday.

I can't complain about the image releases here though -- we got an awful lot of great photos, unprecedentedly quickly for ESA! They've got a small crew and they've done a great job. Many thanks to the ESA operations and OSIRIS teams for their quick work today, and congratulations to everyone involved in Rosetta for what was evidently a productive and successful flyby!

Goodnight, Lutetia. Farewell; I wonder when, if ever, you will be visited again by a spacecraft sent from Earth.
Farewell, Lutetia
Farewell, Lutetia
As Rosetta departed from its encounter with the asteroid (21) Lutetia, its lumpy crescent shrank away. Credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA
What's next for Rosetta? Believe it or not, there is not another thing in its path between now and its arrival, almost four years from now, at comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, in May 2014. Beginning in July of next year, Rosetta will enter a very deep hibernation, sleeping away the subsequent two and a half years, before it finally wakes up to rendezvous with its first comet. In order to match paces with the comet, it must swing much farther from the Sun before approaching it again; that outbound swing will take it to such a great distance that even its enormous solar arrays will be insufficient to keep it ticking along -- thus the long sleep.
Rosetta Flugbahn (flight path)
Rosetta Flugbahn (flight path)
Rosetta's circuitous path through the solar system. Gridlines are astronomical units (average Earth distance from the Sun). The green circle is Earth's orbit ("Erde," in German); blue, Mars; red, comet Churymov-Gerasimenko, Rosetta's eventual target, whose elliptical orbit it must match in order to be able to rendezvous with and land on it in 2014. The dotted gray line is Rosetta's path. Only small portions of the orbits of the two asteroids that Rosetta flew past (Steins and Lutetia) are shown in orange and yellow. Credit: ESA / DLR

Post this page to: del.icio.us Yahoo! MyWeb Digg reddit Furl Blinklist Spurl

Comments

That third 'postage stamp' reminds me a lot of some of the pictues of Eros, too.
#1 - Surreyguy - 07/11/2010 - 01:59
Rosetta pix are spectacular! Who would think we could locate, travel to and photograph such a distant and elusive object...AMAZING! I eagerly await it's rendezvous with the comet. Bon voyage, Rosetta!
#2 - Phil rounds - 07/11/2010 - 06:17
Retweet
I think the 'bathtub' ring & 'dark ejecta' might be related. Perhaps Lutetia has a dark substrate. Or just layers of aggregate with the second layer being darker.

I twitter with my Arnold_Ziffle mask on. 8^)
#3 - Don Barbee - 07/11/2010 - 08:52
It is very Phobo-esque!
I wish I could dock with it and put down safety lines so we could explore the surface in person!
#4 - Mark Townsend - 07/11/2010 - 12:21
Dot of Light on "Farewell" Image
It is possible that the small point of light to the right of the terminator is a satellite of Lutetia?
#5 - Bob Prokop - 07/12/2010 - 09:08
These images of Lutetia remind me of
a picture depicting a flyby of an asteroid by an imaginary probe that appears in p154-155 of "Solar System", a volume from the "Planet Earth" series run by Time-Life
Books (Kendrick Frazier, 1985)

I believe that the image credit is: Paul Hudson/NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC


Real life imitates art, again..
#6 - Apostolos Christou - 07/12/2010 - 11:41
Dot of light
Nope, in all likelihood it's a camera artifact -- either a "hot pixel" on the detector or a cosmic ray hit. When you see something in a digital photo that has that bright a pixel immediately adjacent to totally black pixels, it's most likely one of those two things.
#7 - Emily - 07/13/2010 - 15:16
Squiggly grooves?
The gravitational force must be very low. The grooves can maybe be formed by debris, tumbling boulders or even blocks of ice that was caught by Lutetia in her orbit. They may have been in low orbit around Lutetia and finally landed nearly "horizontal" creating those grooves. If it were ice, it could be evaporated later.
#8 - Henrik Nihlén - 02/08/2011 - 13:14
Name
E-mail (Will not appear online)
Title
Comment
To prevent automated Bots form spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



This comment form is powered by GentleSource Comment Script. It can be included in PHP or HTML files and allows visitors to leave comments on the website.



Emily's on Twitter! »

Sign up for email updates!
Email address:
(optional) Your name: