		Site Map \| Contact Us \| Search:

JOIN

The Planetary Society Blog

By Emily Lakdawalla

Official launch and landing dates announced for Curiosity

May. 21, 2010 | 15:34 PDT | 22:34 UTC

We need your help.
Please donate to support our blog, website, and podcast.

Weblog Archive

Yesterday the Jet Propulsion Laboratory formally announced the launch dates chosen for Curiosity, the next generation Mars rover also known as Mars Science Laboratory. Of course, once the launch date slipped from October 2009, it was always known that the next launch opportunity would not come until late in 2011 with the next alignment of Earth and Mars. But this announcement marks the first time I've seen actual dates put on the launch period, most importantly the first possible launch date, November 25, 2011. Which is the Friday following Thanksgiving. Planetary alignments seem to love making us all work over holidays!

Click to enlarge >

Curiosity descends
In this still from a movie of Curiosity's landing, the rover descends on cables from the backshell as retrorockets fire to slow its descent. Credit: NASA / JPL

The actual launch period will go from November 25 to December 18, 2011. Launch within that period will result in a Mars landing between August 6 and August 20, 2012. This is a relatively short cruise period, and it apparently results in a landing geometry such that Curiosity will not have direct-to-Earth communication capability during landing. Which sounds a bit scary except that this was apparently a consequence of making sure that Curiosity would be in direct communication with both Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter throughout entry, descent, and landing, and, moreover, Odyssey will have direct communication with Earth throughout the same period. What this means is that there will be a "bent-pipe" relay from Curiosity, to Odyssey, directly on to Earth, giving mission controllers telemetry from Curiosity very nearly as quickly as though it were coming direct from the rover, plus it will be at Odyssey's high-gain antenna's data rate of 8 or more kbps as opposed to Curiosity's low-gain antenna's data rate of 1 bit per second. This is how we got the data from Phoenix' landing, and it worked great then.

Of course, it does require Odyssey to still be alive in August 2012, two years from now. There's no particular reason to expect that it won't be. I will mention though that, some time in December, Odyssey will surpass Mars Global Surveyor to become the longest-lived spacecraft to have ever operated at Mars.

In August 2012, it will be late winter in the southern hemisphere, late summer in the northern hemisphere. We still don't know where Curiosity will be landing, so it's not known yet what kinds of environmental conditions the rover will be dealing with upon landing. If the rover is sent to the south, the mission might actually start kind of slowly. Although the rover is nuclear rather than solar powered, there is not an excess of power, and during the winter a lot of that power will have to be used to warm the motors before they can roll the rover.

Curiosity, Curiosity. I still don't love the name but it's growing on me slowly; I think I felt the same way about Spirit and Opportunity after they were announced. I'm getting more time to become accustomed to this one. I noticed that the JPL press release about these launch dates didn't include either the name "Curiosity" or "Mars Science Laboratory" in the title; the longer name was used in the first paragraph, but then "Curiosity" was used the rest of the way through. Regardless of my feelings for the name I'm glad there is a nickname for this mission; I hate long unwieldy names like Mars Science Laboratory and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, but I hate acronyms more because they are obfuscatory to newcomers. So I am gladly following JPL's lead and will be calling this spacecraft Curiosity from now on.

Click to enlarge >

Curiosity
Credit: NASA / JPL

Post this page to:

Comments

Thanks for the update! It is an interesting rationale behind the choice of mission profile, because it seems that having orbiters as relay stations will become a future "must" as it gives higher ROI. We may never leave Mars alone again, with a decent amount of incoming cash flow for exploration. Let's hope!

Naming stuff is important, because it let us connect to technology in an organic way it seems. For example, I believe there are ideas on how how naming cars let the owners relate to them needing gas and oil change as "food", to better remind them.

And I sure like the idea of naming by competition. Otherwise we could see dreadful names like "Project Desert Storm", "Operation Take Over by Sand Rover" and other popular sci fi/militant names. :-o

But Curiosity doesn't quite roll off the tongue as it were; I'll have to agree with that.

#1 - Torbjörn Larsson, OM - 05/22/2010 - 05:48

Would it be possible to put a dedicated network of relay stations in orbit around Mars, or is it far too expensive to send a mission without scientific instrumentation? I was thinking of something smaller and more off-the-shelf so that a number of orbiters could be shipped there on the same vehicle.

#2 - Sili - 05/22/2010 - 10:27

Night vision camera

I agree 100% with this mission. I think we have great mistake in the conception of the rover: the solar panels should be placed in cube position receiving sunlight in 5 of the 6 faces or like a triangular pyramid receiving sunlight in 3 of the 4 faces. Never placed entirely in horizontal position. Another mistake I found in the conception of this rover: not installed a night vision camera ! ...

#3 - José garrido - 05/25/2010 - 12:14

Cannot wait!

I'm really looking foward to this mission the most out of any!, I really hope that they have no problems finding out why methane gases are being re-produced up until this day!, It will be very exciting news to know the answer to that very question!, Happy drilling!. Oh! and I really like the crane landing method being used instead of the other methodes used for past rover landings, It will be very exciting to see the results of the landing and I hope all goes well!.

#4 - kyle sprock - 09/17/2011 - 18:55


Name

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Title

Comment


To prevent automated Bots form spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.

This comment form is powered by GentleSource Comment Script. It can be included in PHP or HTML files and allows visitors to leave comments on the website.

Emily's on Twitter! »