|
The Planetary Society BlogBy Emily LakdawallaUpdate to my S/2008 S1 post: Cassini can fly past it!Mar. 4, 2009 | 09:57 PST | 17:57 UTC
UPDATE: This new moon is now named Aegaeon.
Yes, the G ring is "dusty and extended", but the core of the ring, where the arc and this parent body lives, is only about 500 km wide radially and 500 km thick vertically. (The full ring is more like 11,000 km radial extent by 1,000 km vertical extent.)Cassini's two closest future flybys to S/2008 S1 will be on January 27, 2010, when it will pass at 13,305 kilometers, and December 19, 2015, when it will pass at a mere 1,900 kilometers. If they plan to take images, S/2008 S1 would be 6 pixels across in the first case and a whole 43 pixels across in the second case. Dave says "There has definitely been intensive discussion about imaging this coming January, and we'll most certainly take a shot at it in 2015 –- that is, if our extended-extended mission is approved in its current form." Why wouldn't they image if they were flying that close? Well, these close flybys would be to understand the makeup of the G ring, and the best tools with which to study the G ring would be the dust counter and mass spectrometer. I'm sure imaging will be attempted if it doesn't interfere with observations that are more likely to provide data that really helps in figuring out how the G ring is put together. But I can't imagine they'd do a 1,900-kilometer flyby without shooting some images. It turns out Cassini has, fortuitously, already had three close encounters with S/2008 S1, on September 5, 2007 (at 8,500 kilometers), on June 27, 2007 (at 15,400 kilometers), and on July 21, 2008 (at 11,600 kilometers). But planners didn't know that S/2008 S1 was there, so Cassini didn't see it -- the two just passed like ships in the night. Thanks to Dave (and a few others) for the correction. And, while I'm admitting mistakes, I've corrected a three-order-of-magnitude error I made in reporting the density of Pluto's atmosphere the other day (oops, confused microbars for millibars), and posted a correction about the Chandrayaan-1 miniSAR images from January. (In brief, Chandrayaan-1 miniSAR images look different from the Venus and Titan SAR images that I'm used to because they're shot from a very different incidence angle, much closer to vertical, which helps them search for water ice near the poles.) Thanks to Nigel Gunn and Paul Spudis for the corrections. |
||||