|
The Planetary Society BlogBy Emily LakdawallaCatching up on some readingDec. 28, 2005 | 06:15 PST | 14:15 UTC
I'm writing this from a long plane flight, a post-Christmas trip to see my extremely aged grandparents in Florida. Painful though traveling is it does give me a chance to catch up on some of the reading I don't usually have time to do. I brought two recent issues (from September and October) of the Journal of Geophysical Research - Planets (otherwise known as "JGR") with me today. This is a scientific journal, in which researchers publish peer-reviewed papers about their work, and it's the main one I read besides Science and Nature. There are other important journals in planetary science but this is the key one if you are interested in the geology of planets and moons -- their surfaces, their interiors, and their histories. And it's much less expensive for me to subscribe to than other important journals like Icarus, which I just can't afford.
All that being said, if Darby weren't a friend of mine I probably wouldn't be able to make it through her papers, which are extremely dense with mineral names and petrological terms such as "augite," "cumulate," "nakhlite," "pigeonite," "exsolution lamellae," and one of my all-time favorite mineral names, "smectite." (Sounds rude, doesn't it?) These words frustrate me because I know that just a few years ago each of these words would have called to mind not only the appearance of the mineral in question but also its chemical composition and its likely origin. To petrologists, mineral and rock names form a complicated vocabulary full of significance and meaning, but I only have a hazy memory of it all. It's a foreign language that I learned in my classes in mineralogy, petrology, and planetary geology, but I'm losing it with disuse.
Anyway, I digress from the topic of Darby's paper. Her team performed a pile of different analyses of a Martian meteorite and found that it must have formed from an originally oxidized (that's the opposite of reduced) source magma, which is important because it suggests change over Mars' history or at least local variation in magma composition across Mars, because Mars is a highly reducing chemical environment today. What impressed me about the paper was the amount of analyses performed on a truly tiny sample of rock. They began with a sample of rock amounting to 528 milligrams (0.0186 of an ounce), of which they set aside a 100 milligram chip for thermal emission spectroscopy, and ground up 100 milligrams into a very fine powder for Mössbauer spectroscopy. The remaining 328 milligrams -- tiny amount! -- were "gently crushed by hand" so that they could look at the component mineral crystals. The rovers have access to uncountable numbers of different rocks to sample and study, but here on Earth we have only a tiny precious few samples of rock from Mars to subject to the full array of possible mineralogical analysis.
There were several things I found surprising and interesting about this paper. The main surprise was the depth and complexity of the geologic history that Glotch and Christensen could read from the images, spectral data, and topographic information across the region. Most surprising to me was the fact that the disruption of the ground into chaos terrain wasn't the most recent thing that happened -- instead, it was one of the first events in the story that they told, predated only by the formation of the original crater. The story goes: impact crater happened -- crater got filled with sedimentary or volcanic material -- then there were (probably) multiple catastrophic outflow events, which cause the formation of the chaotic terrain. After that, the crater was infilled again with more layers of sediment and/or lava. One of the many different layers of infilling material contained a lot of hematite like that found at Meridiani, or at least it contained some iron-rich mineral that was later converted to hematite. Then after that there was a tectonic event that caused the whole interior of the crater to dome upward in the center, tilting the layers to the edges, and the pile of domed sediments was cut and eroded into sharp-edged landforms. This is an awfully complicated story being told about one relatively small province on Mars. The conclusions made about the geologic history of Aram Chaos in this paper do have some bearing on the rest of Mars, but at their core they are a story about one small and unique locality on the planet, like the Atacama Desert or Greenland ice sheet or Hawai'ian islands here on Earth. It is getting to the point now where there is so much data covering Mars in so much depth that scientists can do this kind of research, exploring the deep past of one small region through its interlinked topography, mineralogy, stratigraphy, and structure. I think there's only two other place in the solar system where that is true, and that's Earth and the Moon. For all other places in the solar system, scientists' research is most often of a whole-planet view: the atmosphere of Titan, coronae on Venus, stress patterns on Europa, that kind of thing. One last little note: in reading the October issue of JGR, I came across a paper by Karen Stockstill and four coauthors, containing a report of her exhaustive work developing a computer program that mines the Mars Global Surveyor TES data set to search for evidence of carbonate minerals in Martian craters. Many Mars craters look like they've had rivers flowing through them and appear from space to be likely spots to search for evaporite minerals and other hallmarks of ancient lake deposits. But Karen found no evidence for carbonates in any of them -- including Aram Chaos. If the carbonates are there, she and her coauthors concluded, they are not exposed to view from Mars Global Surveyor above a 5 or 8 percent level. |
|||||||